4

Warhawk 2: What Should Change?

After a long and bumpy road in development, Warhawk was finally released in 2007 for the Playstation 3. The multiplayer-only title immediately became a fan favorite and still maintains a strong fan base currently. However, Warhawk did come with several flaws
 that hinder the experience a little bit. Here are a few fixes that Warhawk 2 can improve on from Warhawk.

More Players

Even though Warhawk supports 32-players online, some of the maps are so big that players often spend time traveling through the terrain to get through important areas. Warhawk 2 should be able to at least double the amount of players playing on one map at a time. We have already seen several Playstation 3 games like Resistance 2 (60 players) and MAG (256 players) support massive amounts of players. Thus, Warhawk 2 supporting 64+ players shouldn't be too far out of reach.

Sea Combat

In Warhawk, you can battle above the clouds with fighter jets in addition to fighting on feet or vehicles on the ground. The only element missing is sea battles. Although Warhawk has water, you will die if you touch the dangerous material. Warhawk 2 should introduce sea combat with battleships and further diversify the addicting and chaotic gameplay of the first game.

Class Based

Warhawk requires teamwork; however, most players often ignore the main objective and only play for their own individual goals. A class system of sorts like the one found in Killzone 2 should be able to fix that. Each class ought to give specialized abilities that will help out the team and the individual. They should also be awarded with extra points for performing their specific tasks to encourage teamwork.

Controls

Warhawk on the Playstation 3 had a high-learning curve. As a result, many gamers couldn't get into the game. It also didn't help that there wasn't a tutorial mode in the beginning to help players. Much of the above problems can be attributed to the complicated controls. Warhawk 2 should streamline the control setup so that players can easily jump in and start enjoying their experience.

Single Player

Otter
Written by Otter
Otter is a free lance writer currently residing in San Francisco. He loves to play and talk video games.  -  Full profile
High prices? High performance? HD-era? Blue-Ray? Are they good? or are they bad?
The PlayStation Portable's got some great games, but they're all pretty expensive due to the technology. Here are some cheap PSP games that'll keep you satisfied until the next paycheck comes in.
Sony PlayStation 3 launches on November 17th, 2006 to waiting and eager console gaming fans. With the newest edition to the PlayStation line this next generation console doesn't dissapoint with feature rich content and awesome looking graphics.
As if Sony can't stop shooting holes in it's left foot: European and other PAL-format PlayStation 3 consoles receive slight redesign efforts at the cost of not just improved frugality, but backward compatibility changes that primarilly affect support for PS2 titles.
The PlayStation gaming console gives you the right to connect to the Internet to play some of their games that are available for Internet play.
When the PlayStation 3 first came, you were lucky if you could find one in stores, or buy it for the actual retail price. During that time the PlayStation reached prices in the thousands on eBay, with people actually paying those prices.
An article I wrote a few months ago discussing the campaign trail directly after the first Democratic presidential debate. This will be followed with an updated take on the Circus of Fools.
Related information
  • Warhawk 2 supporting 64+ players shouldn't be too far out of reach.
  • Warhawk 2 should introduce sea combat.
  • Warhawk on the Playstation 3 had a high-learning curve.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 13 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

i also forgot to say they should have split screen ranked online as well as unranked. plus split screen campaine

Posted on 08/29/2009 at 1:08:01 PM

i like the idea of more people and a single player campaine. And they should have all most completely destrutive enviroment. the sea battles sound good but not as good becasue you would get bombarded by warhawks and get killed in seconds. they should have an easyer ranking systerm that every can acturly be assed to do and they should add more weapons like an electical gun and more cars and things i like the truck and the 4x4 in the first one but you just need more in mo.

Posted on 08/29/2009 at 1:08:59 PM

the game really needs a squad system and what would be even better would be to copy bf2 with the commander promotion, a single person who was voted commander can issue orders to all squads e.g. capture a base or prepare to cap the flag etc the biggest problem in warhawk is the lack of teamplay if your not playing with your own friends/clan but if someone who was elected gave out orders it could work. Id like to see tanks being able to pick up weapons similar to how the warhawks can, for example they could switch the main cannon to a flak cannon to deal with a hovering warhawk or switch to a machine gun to deal with infantry a little easier, but have limited ammo for these unlike the main gun. Really hoping for a warhawk 2 as theres not much people playing these days and theres still some bugs. No expansion for a while now so a sequal would be the next step. Its definately still one of my favourite online games to play and has in my opinion the best CTF any game has offered since

Posted on 08/09/2009 at 6:08:40 PM

No to the class system i don't see how that would work. Sea battles... could be over the top! The controls in my opinion are fine, BUT i agree that there should have been a demo and a turorial from the start... this would have publicised it better and it would be more active than it is. A single player mode would be good I would like to know the history behind it! 64 players would be nice especialy if the maps were a bit bigger. I like kpdc1's ideas, graphics, players and destructable enviroment might work!

Posted on 05/06/2009 at 4:05:43 AM

I"m excited about the prospect of another warhawk but I could disagree more on some of your comments... for one, I like 32 players on the massive boards... sure you've got a long drive or flight from spot to spot but that's what made it so awesome... you could route some troops around the flanks and not have to worry about guys being stacked on top of each other... and while I was disappointed that there was no single player initially, I think the game as a multiplayer only was great... IF there is going to be any single player added, it should just be a complete and robust tutorial, and not neccessarily a campaign. And finally the controls were great... don't mess with them. Sure, there is a learning curve, but a complete tutorial or your requested campaign should take care of the training.

Posted on 04/21/2009 at 11:04:15 AM

dude, you made some good points and overall your article is pretty good. Just check your grammar and spelling next time. You're using the wrong words, like "fractions" instead of factions. But, again, good points.

Posted on 04/07/2009 at 12:04:28 AM

Easier trophies >=[

Posted on 04/06/2009 at 9:04:06 PM

i quit playing killzone becuase of the class system so maybe not that

Posted on 04/06/2009 at 8:04:13 PM

i agree except for the class system, i think they should keep everything the same just update the graphics, double the players, add distructible environments and sea battles

Posted on 04/06/2009 at 6:04:55 PM

Good read. I agree with the water combat point. It would be amazing to have a small aircraft carrier were you can launch your warhawk and also some kind of speed boat with anti air turrets...

Posted on 04/06/2009 at 4:04:14 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 13 Next >>

Have more to say?
Become a Contributor on AC

Most Comments Today