Find » Opinion/Editorial » Myspace: "Breastfeeding is Offensiv...

Myspace: "Breastfeeding is Offensive"

By April Fox, published Feb 26, 2007
Published Content: 50  Total Views: 51,761  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.8 of 5
Go to Myspace, and click on some random profiles. Chances are, you'll come across some things that could be considered offensive: Pamela Anderson clad in nothing but a thong, a girl who can't be over sixteen in a provocative pose, graphics that look like road signs showing stick figures in various positions performing sex acts, a mother feeding her baby.

Wait a minute-what did I just say? A mother feeding her baby? Actually, that's the one thing I listed that you probably won't see, because the people who are in charge of deciding what's offensive on Myspace are deleting photos of breastfeeding infants, in the name of decency.

Lisa Marie Gittings of Asheville, NC had her photos removed without any explanation. As she was nursing her eight-month-old son, her three-year-old snapped a picture. In support of the breastfeeding community, Lisa Marie posted the picture on her Myspace page. I didn't see the picture myself, because every time she reloads them, Myspace removes them, but I can tell you from my own experience in nursing, far less of the breast is exposed during breastfeeding than in some of the photos I've seen on Myspace. When a baby nurses, his head covers almost the entire breast. If you are large-busted, you might show as much skin as you would in a modest two-piece bathing suit. Not only is Lisa Marie a mother trying to feed her child in the healthiest way possible; she also offers professional breastfeeding support to new mothers, in an attempt to ensure that more babies in the US are as healthy as possible. Lisa Marie wrote to the administration at Myspace asking for an explanation of why her photos were removed, but hasn't heard back, as of this writing. She says, "I feel that by banning these images, Myspace is telling young mothers that breastfeeding is an unnatural and disgusting act, and therefore they are not promoting the health of children and families...they are violating our rights by censoring these family photos."

Myspace: "Breastfeeding is Offensive"

To some at Myspace, breastfeeding images are not appropriate.

Credit: breastfeeding.org

Copyright: breastfeeding.org

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 131
Next >>
 
I am only ten and i let my dog lick my privet

Posted on 08/24/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
there are all kinds of sick and perversion. BREASTFEEDING in NOT one of them. if more women breastfed we would have healthier babies more caring mothers(because of the bond it forms)not to mention less OBESE children. most anything manmade that has a shelf life causes cancer.... if we went back to the way god intended, NATURAL this earth would be a better place.

Posted on 03/20/2007 at 4:03:00 PM

 
I'm adding my support. I'm a father of a child who breastfed for over a year, and a nurse practitioner. As a healthcare professional, it boggles my mind that anyone could object to women using their breasts for their primary purpose!

Posted on 03/20/2007 at 9:03:00 AM

 
Sickos could decide to jerk off to pictures of me in a bikini or my son wandering around in his diaper, or to pictures of my feet, but that doesn't mean I'm going to rack my brain over every sex fetish before posting pictures to make sure in my mind that no one is going to masturbate to it. While the nursing experience is wonderful and personal, breastfeeding in itself is just that...feeding time, and parents want to document it and share it with the world just like any other moment in their child's life. We take pix of our kids bathing and share them; why should BFing be any different? Sickos might decide to jerk off to pics of my son in a pool but does that mean I shouldn't photograph him in his swim trunks? In any case Myspace has a privacy setting where only FRIENDS can see your pictures, and I have mine enabled and only add friends that I personally know. And those private pictures are being deleted, too, not just the public ones.

Posted on 03/13/2007 at 12:03:00 AM

 
I'm sure there's a certain portion of guys that look at breastfeeding pictures and get off to it... I know I wouldn't want that kind of pic of me online. However, the woman is old enough to have a baby and feed her child responsibly--she is old enough to decide that for herself. It's dumb of MySpace to ban these pics while allowing nearly nude underage ladies and pics of pot smokers.

Posted on 03/12/2007 at 7:03:00 PM

 
I wrote an article about an email I got from MySpace when I reported an underage girl smoking weed, drinking and posing nude in her pictures. MySpace sent a email saying the content in the pictures DIDN'T violate their terms. I think it obvious Tom has his priorities and breastfeeding mothers don't come into that picture.

Posted on 03/10/2007 at 1:03:00 PM

 
first off let me say I do think breast feeding is natural and best for babies if possible. I was breast fed and so was my son. However I'm not sure why Women would want pictures of such a prsonal moment posted where every pervert in the world would have free access to jerk off too it.

Posted on 03/03/2007 at 12:03:00 PM

 
Oh wow. That's insane, I mean I could see if she was flashing herself or something. I find it hard to believe those that get so offended by breastfeeding, it's completely natural. People don't get offended when they see animals mating out in public so what's the big deal? Seriously, those myspace porn bots and attention seeking underage teens need to be dealt with. I'd rather come across a picture of a mother breastfeeding, than an underage girl in nothing but her bra and panties >_

Posted on 03/03/2007 at 11:03:00 AM

 
I'm not reading all the comments here because I don't have time at the moment, but I just wanted to show support. It's disgusting that Myspace doesn't delete many of the porn-bot profiles, no matter how often they are reported (I've reported a few myself, with no results), yet nursing moms have their photos or entire profiles deleted. Many of the photos that have been deleted show no nipple and barely any skin. Breastfeeding is not pornography! Get a grip people!

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 9:03:00 AM

 
Just wanted to register my support for Lisa. I honestly believe we seriously need to normalize breastfeeding in America. They show more skin in the shop windows at the mall than I show while breastfeeding in public and yet still some people choose to be offended by it. Thankfully, North Carolina law protects women's right to breastfeed in public--discreetly or not!

Posted on 03/01/2007 at 7:03:00 AM

 
Pennya, thanks for posting the link again. :)

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 11:02:00 AM

 
Wow 127 comments! I guess I shouldn't go to sleep in the middle of a comments debate :D Although I think when this is over with someone should repost the link to the petition again since its buried now. Speaking of which I'll post it again right now: http://www.petitiononline.com/Brstfeed/petition.html

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 10:02:00 AM

 
John- You actually made the statement that no woman should breastfeed. "Man made is better, let's be paranoid about the miniscule possibility she MIGHT end up with a nutritional deficiency, etc."

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 8:02:00 AM

 
The AAP's '97 policy statement said "Human milk is the preferred feeding for all infants, including premature and sick newborns, with rare exceptions. When direct breastfeeding is not possible, expressed human milk...should be provided." Their new policy statement includes even more information about donor milk. Clearly the AAP considers formula to be the least best food for a baby, a last resort when no human milk is available. The WHO and UNICEF agree. The new AAP policy states that it is a "staunch advocate of breastfeeding as the optimal form of nutrition forinfants...Human milk is uniquely superior for infant feeding... "Breastfeeding ensures the best possible health [and] developmental and psychosocial outcomes for the infant." They call it the ideal food for babies. I trust the AAP, UNICEF, WHO. Why don't you? Are they not credible?

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 12:02:00 AM

 
Just to be sure I reread my comments for the "Heatherism" you mentioned. I can't see where I said that all women can or should breastfeed. Could you point it out to me? Maybe I'm just going blind. :/

Posted on 02/28/2007 at 12:02:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 131
Next >>
Most Commented On