Social Structure Theory and Crime

A State of Imbalance Fed by Society

Structural functionalists believe that society is made up of institutions and groups that shift, move and alter their mutual influence. The aftermath of cooperation, competition, accommodation and conflict is characterized by a unified social system. This social system acts as a control
 for behavior within the society and is viewed as “in balance.” 

Society, as it is defined within the physical boundaries of the United States is, by structural theory parameters, one of organic solidarity. That is, a society that requires an external force, the state, to create cohesiveness because a unified social system does not exist. Personal desires are highly encouraged in this country. The United States has distinct challenges when it comes to the idea of unrestrained ambition. America is considered by a portion of the world to be “the land of opportunity,” a place where anyone can achieve their goals and the opportunity to do so is inherent. The American Dream is to become wealthy, to “have it all.” The idea of moving from “rags to riches” colors our perspectives and permeates our media. Our own constitution promotes the rights of the individual, individual freedom of choice and the pursuit of happiness, as each individual defines it. 

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

(continuation of comment below) the right circumstances, of veering away from societal norms of the day. Again, it was nice to read something that actually commented on the topic instead of all the insipid, brainless blips of foul language and one syllable negative grunts that so often find their way to online articles. While one or two word comments stating agreement are understandable, one or two word comments stating disagreement provide no insight into the other person's ideas or beliefs. Morgan Summerfield

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 6:03:28 AM

I just wanted to say thank you, Bryan, for your intelligent comments on my article, "Social Structure Theory and Crime." I don't expect people to agree with me all the time, but I think it is reasonable to believe that, if people take the time to leave a comment, they will at least put some thought into it. I have found it interesting that some people are interpreting this piece to mean that I am condemning poor people for engaging in criminal activity, which was not even close to its intent. Your added "or perceive themselves forced" was something I did not address in the article, but is very valid. Perception is an individual's reality. My personal view about crime theory is that it isn't as good as the paper it is written on, because change occurs so rapidly today and it always has a foundation in the human brain-which is heavily influenced by personal experience and often travels down paths of self-delusion. The fact of the matter is that any one of us is capable, given

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 6:03:57 AM

It seems to me that the biggest factor in structural theory as it pertains to crime deals with those who are forced (or percieve themselves as forced) into a position where resorting to crime is their only hope for survival. Forget societal advancement - the vast majority of ghetto crime is an offshoot of the inhabitants' inability to secure a stable future through any alternative means. Certainly, once the criminal lifestyle is embraced, people get greedy (just as in any other enterprise), but the initial choice to engage in crime is often a desperate response to a desperate situation.

Posted on 03/22/2008 at 12:03:31 PM

Quit waving the flag & get to the stats.

Posted on 11/20/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

Very cool, indeed. I needed this to do my homework.

Posted on 11/20/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5