Find » Arts & Entertainment » Books » On the Beach: Stanley Kramer's Film...

On the Beach: Stanley Kramer's Film Adaptation of Nevil Shute's Novel

This Dystopian Look at the Atomic Age Drops the Bomb on Humanity with an All Star Hollywood Cast to Boot

By Jason Cangialosi, published Dec 17, 2005
Published Content: 74  Total Views: 183,990  Favorited By: 29 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.3 of 5
On The Beach 

830 tons of plutonium and uranium contamination from atomic weapons tests were buried beneath Monte Bello Island off the coast of western Australia in the 1950s. Stashed along with it was knowledge that this harmful substance could resurface and poison the native Aborigines, plant and animal life. Today, due to common knowledge of within the nuclear community, anyone with Internet access or a library card can read about it. Otherwise it could be found deep within the allegorical context of Nevil Shute's novel On The Beach.

In Stanley Kramer's production of the film adaptation this allegory comes alive in the beautiful black and white work of D.L Fapp and G. Rotunno and an A-list cast. The facets of the allegory reflect a political history from the Atomic Age as well as the mechanistic wedge technology drives between the relationships of men and women.

Before analyzing the film adaptation, it should be mentioned that Shute's novel is of classic status upon which the frustrations of a scientist and gifted author rest. His speculative science fiction story is a dystopian world of atomic radiation fallout, which could be closer to a reality uncomfortable for most to recognize. The surviving inhabitants of earth seek refugee on Australia as civilization's drama unfolds its last act. It is mentioned in the Nevil Shute Archives On Line that the author was not fully satisfied with John Paxton's screenplay as some of the themes were misinterpreted. Though Shute's central message still survives in the film as a distress signal to the world about atomic weapons.

The actual distress signal from the story is a key point in the origin of blame and the story's pointed finger as a critic of atomic weapons testing. It is important not in who is sending the distress signal, but where it is coming from. The last American survivors, with the help of Australian naval officers and British scientists board the submarine Sawfish to seek out this phantom distress signal. The signal coming by way of telegraph is indecipherable as Morse code, yet it could be the only glimmer of hope on a planet scorched by nuclear war.

Comments
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
basura

Posted on 11/04/2007 at 9:11:00 AM

 
[got cut short --- ] net, net, see the original, if you feel like it, see the remake, then keep a copy of Dr. Strangelove as the antidote to the inevitable dark depression :)

Posted on 08/30/2007 at 9:08:00 AM

 
There are two versions, the 1960's original (B&W, set int he 60's) and a 2000 remake (color, set in the 00's). The original is much more powerful than the remake (which stars Armond Assente and Rachel Ward) (spoiler follows - it's predictable, but if you want to experience the full poignency of the movie stop reading now.............OK, you've been warned.....second warning...) In the original, Tower chooses duty over love and leaves with the sawfish to die in the US. This always bothered me. I thought that in any remake, he should stay with Moira and in the 2000 version he does. Oddly enough, this ending seemed so much less "satisfactory" an ending than the original and much less appropriate than I thought it woudl be. There are other minor changes -- Australia in the 00's seems more like "prelude to Mad Max" than in the 1960's version, but other than the ending, everythign else is pretty much left intact. Overall, however, I thought the remake (a) moved too slow (b) had less b

Posted on 08/30/2007 at 9:08:00 AM

 
I thought the film underscored the human elements really well. The surroundings and environment may change behavior but emotions stay the same.

Posted on 03/06/2007 at 12:03:00 AM

 
Unfortunately I�ve only read the book but it�s going to be really exciting when I get to see the film! I just have to find it first!! The book anyway was amaaaaazin!!

Posted on 04/19/2006 at 5:04:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Advertisment