The Lost Tomb of Jesus: An Inconvenient Truth, or an Invalid Dramatization?

By Sara Smith, published Mar 13, 2007
Published Content: 25  Total Views: 6,969  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 2.0 of 5
Over twenty years ago, a tomb was found in Jerusalem in a construction site. Twenty years later, a filmmaker is claiming that this is the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and His family. A further look into the recent film will seek to show whether or not this discovery is an inconvenient truth or an invalid dramatization.

The film by Simcha Jacobovichi is indeed a fine show of cinematography, and as a viewer I found myself (regardless of my personal faith and understanding of the scriptures) eager with anticipation and anxiety to see what the search would present, and what the results of the scientific evidence would prove. The film tugged at the heartstrings of Christian faith, but seemed to make some sort of evidence that this truly could be the tomb of Christ.

Immediately I pulled out a Bible and read along with the references given, and this is where things became a little fuzzy. Taken out of context, the referenced scripture could mean what they were saying, but putting it into context proved another story altogether. During the film, they proposed a scenario that when Christ was hanging on the cross, and moments from death he looked upon his "beloved follower" and Mary stating "This is your son," and "This is your Mother." The proposed scenario was that he was speaking to Mary Magdalene, and their "son" Judah. However, upon inspection of the scripture (and it doesn't take close inspection), it is made clear that He is speaking to his mother: "When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home. John 19:26-27 KJV.

The Lost Tomb of Jesus: An Inconvenient Truth, or an Invalid Dramatization?

Is all that Christianity is based upon truly on the line?

Credit: Chance Agrella

Copyright: www.freerangestock.com

Takeaways
  • Biblical references taken out of context
  • Too many "ifs" to consider
  • Did the scientific evidence go far enough?
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 24
Next >>
 
Besides the bible we also need to study history as there are maney protectors of tha christian faith. Look to the nights templar and what they have protected since the time of Jesus. Free Masonry also holds maney secrets. God wants us to be open minded not mindless drones to the wims of some men who only wrote their FEELINGS down in a book.

Posted on 06/08/2007 at 10:06:00 AM

 
i believe that this film is an attack to the christian faith, proven that the romans cannot see the body of jesus, remember that jesus is the alpha and omega the begenning and the everlasting, the film the da vince code , the lost tomb of jesus are all scrap films

Posted on 06/05/2007 at 8:06:00 PM

 
I agree with James on his post. I think unknown to the vast majority of the public there is a smear job going on against christianity and of course Jesus. The media masters, the elite jews of the world who own all of the media we see and read everyday are weakening the will and spirit of there most hated rivals, Jesus and his church. I encourage anyone right now to simply go ahead and do a little investagating and see how our society is shielded from the truth. ex whats really happening in israel, how they treat christians in israel, there views of christians. Then when you discover who really owns and controls virtually 99% of all news we see via television and newsprint you will understand how such a documentary even makes it to the air and is allowed to be discussed in a cival and open manner.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 8:03:00 PM

 
This is very good writing. I have to agree with you, Jesus was talking to his mother and John one of his disciples. If the findings were accurate (they are not), this would dispute that Jesus was risen on the third day. If Jesus had not risen the sacrifice of his body would have been for nothing. Where as the sacrifice was meant for us to have a chance for everlasting life. If this was true then doubting Thomas would not have had the chance to stick in his fingers in the side and hand were Jesus Christ had been tortured. The beginning of Acts would be null. After being resurrected Jesus made numerous appearances to his followers. Jesus died as a man but was risen as a King so that you and I could have a chance for everlasting life.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 11:03:00 AM

 
GOOD INTERESTING READ

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 11:03:00 AM

 
1 the tomb was inthe wrong city as he was born in Bethlehem Joseph,s home city where his family would have had a tomb if they had the wealth.A carpenter was not of the upperclass therefor buryed in a field with no markings or cased out with the ashes from the grates. His mother Joseph and Mary with brothers lived and worked in Nazareth 66 miles as the crow flies from Jerusalem "if" the famly had a tomb it would never have been in Jerusalem,more than likley the family members would have been interned where they Died and the bones shifted to Nazareth later if the Family (uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers,and sisters)had a plot set aside for this.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 3:03:00 AM

 
I had a typo, that was suppose to say film and not feel. Sorry about this.While I am here, I might as well say it again, High Five.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 1:03:00 AM

 
Now I am going to have to look into this. I didn't know that they were even making a new feel about Jesus. I remember when that movies that Mel Gibson directed, came out, there was a lot of controversy over it. I don't discuss rather or not I believe them because my opinion would probably only upset a few hundred people and I'm not going to tell you which ones either. However, I can say that you wrote an amazing article and I give you a high five and I can't wait to finish reading all of the comments left on here.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 1:03:00 AM

 
It was a great documentary and this was an interesting article. It was funny how they stopped the process, had the debate that didnt end. And now leave it up to the world or whoever is interested to jump in.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 6:03:00 PM

 
Ms. Smith, I commend you for sticking to the facts in this piece and trying not to allow any personal bias to slant your coverage. While I personally do not regard the various versions of the bible as valid references, I respect your beliefs. This was a well presented opinion piece. Thank you.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 6:03:00 PM

 
I find it ironic that people are trying to debunk this dramatic documentary's scientific claims with magic ones of their own. "I can't be Jesus's tomb. He ascended into the blissful netherworld we call 'heaven.'"

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 4:03:00 PM

 
Very well written. I am glad to see someone who doesn't believe everything they read, see, or hear!

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 12:03:00 PM

 
Trying to take personal convictions and belief out of the equation (a hard thing, I know), I was trying to speak to the proven historical accuracy of the Bible and how it is possible to come to any concusion on the subject by looking for your own agenda- which is what I believe the filmmaker did. I love the comments from both sides of the argument, it shows people are thinking! I encourage everyone to research and come to a personal conclusion, then stand by it.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 11:03:00 AM

 
there will be more films like this made to attack the essence of christianity. unfortunately, a lot of people will believe such stories without questions. it is obvious that the film was made to spite the founder of the christian faith

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 10:03:00 AM

 
Pretending that your bible can be treated as complete, precise and accurate "fact" is amusing. Ignoring the political meddling in its creation, there have been many (many!) translations, and there is *no* definitive edition. All of the oldest copies are different from each other, and are from after the death of Jesus anyway. So just because you really really *really* want it to be so, doesn't mean that it really is. If there's insufficient evidence in the tomb, then enjoy looking for evidence of much else in your bible. The reviewer complains of "convenient self paraphrasing of the scripture" but fails to think through the self-contradictions all over the bible. Good review, for a simple-minded religion junkie.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 9:03:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 24
Next >>
Most Commented On