Why Digital Rights Management is on Its Way Out

The Death of DRM

By Phil Dotree, published Mar 14, 2007
Published Content: 412  Total Views: 689,786  Favorited By: 29 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.5 of 5
Ask any iPod hater why they detest the world's most popular mp3 player and you're bound to get one of two answers. The first is that it's too trendy and popular (this is hard to argue with). The second thing they'll mention is the DRM, or Digital Rights Management, of Apple's iTunes store.

For digital music lovers, iTunes' insistence on locking their files down to avoid trouble with the RIAA has always been somewhat of a pain. Of course, it's easy to get rid of the "protection" by simply burning Apple's AAC files onto a CD and then ripping them back off, but the fact that you have to go through the trouble is painful to iPod listners who tout their mp3 players as the best on the market.

Apple may be one of the first major music stores to try to change that, though. After European rulings that the Digital Rights Management of Apple's iTunes is illegal via the fair use policies of several countries (notably France), Steve Jobs and company have been quietly suggesting to the RIAA that copy protection should be removed entirely from music.

This all came to a head in Jobs' open letter to the music community entitled "Thoughts On Music." Posted on the Apple website, it was the first major public suggestion from Apple, Inc. that DRM should disappear.

As much as the major record companies will hate to admit it, Jobs is right.

For a typical album, the digital price is about $10, whereas the price for a physical CD is somewhere around $12. But the physical album--aside from having value as an artifact of the music to many listeners--can be ripped to produce royalty-free mp3s and lossless files that audiophiles claim sound better than mp3s. You also get liner notes and artwork, though iTunes and some other music stores are making efforts to start making these things available in a digital format. And CDs are easy to use for non-tech savvy music listeners, providing a further justification for buying a physical product.

If the CD is common enough to be easily available at a retail store, the choice is obvious for most consumers.

Why Digital Rights Management is on Its Way Out

MP3 players often support only one kind of DRM.

Credit: lananylope

Copyright: www.sxc.hu

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
Let's agree that there's a set of very intense incentives for Apple to get rid of its own DRM, and it looks like they're making moves to do that. Also, once they do it, the other companies should fold. Then, we'll drink the finest wines and celebrate with the merry dance you speak of.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 9:03:00 AM

 
See, I'm with you on everything except that "Apple is the company that will do it." It seems more to me that they'll have it done to them. At least we can all agree to do a little dance on the day DRM does finally die.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 9:03:00 AM

 
Businesses act for the sake of their business. The legal climate in Europe is unquestionably what's motivating Apple, but regardless, the point is that DRM will die and Apple is the company that will do it. Obviously, it will be designed for their own benefit, but that's because businesses operate according to a profit.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 6:03:00 PM

 
But I don't think Apple is really applying that much weight to it. Ultimately, having the biggest digital music store and the biggest selling MP3 player means it kind of makes sense for to DRM the shit out of their files. I mean, they could offer other forms or DRM, or share their own, but they don't. It's designed so iTunes songs can only play on iPods. On paper that's smart business. The only incentive for Apple to get rid of DRM is that the current climate in Europe is a HUGE pain in their ass. I'm glad Jobs came out with that little note against DRM, because it'll only help us eliminate it. I just question his motives.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 4:03:00 PM

 
Yeah, Tyler, but the biggest kid on the block is the most important. I had an emusic account for years, but emusic is more for indie labels, not the big 'uns. And if Apple can throw enough weight to get the big 'uns behind it, they will undoubtedly be the driving force behind the change.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 2:03:00 PM

 
I don't think you can consider Apple "one of the first" when eMusic has already built a hugely successful business on legal, non-DRM downloads without the support of the RIAA and major labels. You're right that we're moving to non-DRM, or at least less DRM, but Apple's hardly the driving force behind it. They just happen to be the biggest kids on the block talking about it right now.

Posted on 03/14/2007 at 2:03:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On