Find » Legal » Can You Sue Your Lawyer for Malprac...

Can You Sue Your Lawyer for Malpractice?

Nailing Your Attorney for Malpractice

By Steve Thompson, published Mar 16, 2007
Published Content: 2,675  Total Views: 2,363,052  Favorited By: 175 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
You know that you hire a lawyer when you want to sue someone, but what if he botches the case? Can you sue your lawyer for malpractice when he screws up? It isn't too far outside the realm of possibility that your lawyer will cost you your case, but in some instances, you won't have much recourse. Suing your lawyer for malpractice is a risky venture, even if you do have the ability. You are usually well-advised to handle the matter a different way, especially since the ABA isn't usually much help.

The problem is that many people don't do enough research when hiring a lawyer in the first place. Just because an attorney has ten years of experience in corporate law doesn't mean that he's any good at it. In fact, longevity in practice isn't any indication at all of a lawyer's abilities. You're better off looking at his or her track record in the courtroom. For example, a woman in New Jersey was shocked about five years ago when she learned, after losing her child custody case, that her attorney had never been in a courtroom before. His law firm had been open for more than fifteen years, but none of his cases had ever made it past the filing stage. This is a big risk to take when winning means the difference between a large sum of money and an empty wallet.

In order to sue your lawyer for malpractice, you'll not only have to prove that he didn't represent you to the best of his or her ability, but also that the court case would have ended differently if you had been given proper representation. This can be difficult to substantiate because the law is often subjective, particularly in civil matters. The outcome depends largely on the mindsets of the jurors or judge, which will vary depending on the courtroom.

In order to prove that your case would have turned out differently, you will have to demonstrate that your lawyer failed to present evidence or otherwise acted in a manner unbecoming of an officer of the court. In most cases, your word won't be sufficient to sue your lawyer for malpractice; the testimony of other legal professionals and witnesses must also be included in order to win.

Comments
Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
 
Looking for help; I had a judgement served on me about a mortgage nonpayment which was false, The judgement was dated Apr.06 it was served to me on Dec.06, 8 months later. I hired a lawyer to fight, he is a realestate/contract/bankruptcy lawyer. He new we were telling the truth and they violated the law, he asked what we wanted to do and I said sue them. Well he never entered an answer on the judgement for us. He filed bankruptcy in our case then bailed on us. Now its to late to file a counter claim. We would like to find a good attorney to sue him any ideas? I am from Meadville, Pa.

Posted on 06/23/2008 at 2:06:11 PM

 
My divorce was in Ohio too. I think that Ohio houses all the lawyers who do not have malpractice insurance. I believe they all gravitate towards Ohio, so if you have a case pending in Ohio with an attorney, I wish you lots of luck!

Posted on 11/15/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
MA: I understand how you feel. I went through a messy divorce myself. I filed for the divorce but it seems that my "husband was granted the divorce". What a joke. You are right -- lawyers should be equated to crooks. My attorney did not disclose to me he had no malpractice insurance but yet, it is required through professional conduct in the Supreme Court to notify the client and sign a document to the fact they are aware. So I guess I am the one that is out too. No settlement, but I was left holding the bag of empty promises.

Posted on 11/15/2007 at 9:11:00 PM

 
Miffed in Ohio: I was also stunned to find out that many lawyers do not have malpractice insurance. Being a professional in the medical field, I am required to carry malpractice insurance- amazing. I refuse to give up on suing my attorneys= they promised and never delivered, nor did they litigate issues that have cost me dearly in a divorce settlement. Of course, there is the judge to deal with also- one that never heard contempt motions for over 4 years and then at the end of the divorce, dismissed them all. My divorce is over, yet I sit here with no property settlement completed and no child support enforced yet. It is amazing what a mess the courts are in- I am SOOOOOOOOOO damn glad that I never became an attorney- since I equate being an attorney to a crook now.

Posted on 10/31/2007 at 8:10:00 PM

 
The last three lawyers I have employed loved to talk on the phone about anything but a straight forward answer to the question. They would send me bills for the time we talked which I had kept track of and found them to be dishonest and embelishing of their fees knowing I had no recorse. One never filed the case and then told me I had told their secretary not to file it. thinking it had been filed three months past as I awaited the court date. Finally after arguing the point back and forth explaining I did not hire an attorney to do nothing, he became defensive and even hostile. In all three cases questioning there charges, their time keeping when it came to charges or their supposed time spent on the case always resulted in defensiveness and hostility. One lawyer quoted me a price for a prenuptial agreement which was delivered so late that it could not be signed before the marriage and then charging me more than the amount quoted. One lawyer never remembered what we had talked

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
I know of one attorney who was sued (successfully too, I might add!) for legal malpractice, since he based his legal advice on old law he knew (instead of just checking to see if anything had changed). Had to do with a Steppenwolf concert and the riot that occurred when they didn't play ;) So yes, attorneys (especially those in larger firms) should carry malpractice insurance. Lawyers, all lawyer jokes aside, are still like the rest of us and subject to human error.

Posted on 07/09/2007 at 7:07:00 PM

 
This is very good information. I was stunned to find out that lawyers are not required to carry malpractice and what types of behaviors are allowed. While anyone can make a mistake, it seems lawyers are allowed far more leeway than other professionals. I had wondered what happens when an appellate lawyer fails to file the right motions and does not know your case well enough to argue it - is there any resource to find that out?

Posted on 06/11/2007 at 3:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 7 of 7
 
Advertisment