Bush Admits He Would Have Gone to War Knowing What We Know Now

That's Because He Knew Then What He Knows Now

Okay, so now Bush admits that even if he had known then what everyone knows now he would still have invaded Iraq.

Some people are surprised by this revelation. As if Bush could possibly have it within him to invade a country he called an imminent threat even when it was proven that country wasn't. No one should be surprised by the revelation that Bush wouldn't need any justification whatever to invade Iraq. Nor should they be surprised by his uncharacteristically honest admission.

Somewhere in America there is a reporter right now who is going to get tired of covering the story of the disappearance of an unexceptional pretty white girl in a foreign country; who is going to get tired of covering the story of a good looking white man who murdered his pregnant wife; who is going to get tired of covering the latest distraction away from the really important story going unnoticed and uncovered by the so-called liberal media: That Pres. George W. Bush knew from the beginning there wasn't a single weapon of mass destruction anywhere to be found in the entire country of Iraq when he decided to invade that country.

Bush is all too aware of that there is evidence somewhere to prove this. Bush is acutely aware of the fact that he never for a minute believed any of the bogus evidence that has been rolled out as proof that he made this atrocious decision based on misguided reports. The American public was supposed to find out all along that Bush was supposedly "misled." That way he can, as usual, let the buck stop not at his door but at the door of some unfortunately underling who is stupid enough to fall on his sword.

The reason Bush is admitting he would have gone to war even knowing what he knows now is because the evidence is sitting somewhere waiting to be found that will prove he did go to war knowing what he knows now.