The Scooter Libby Trial and the Need for Accountability in America

By N. Katers, published Mar 13, 2007
Published Content: 510  Total Views: 341,005  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.8 of 5
I was listening to NPR's Fresh Air the day that Lewis "Scooter" Libby, former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, was indicted on four of five charges brought against him in regards to obstructing justice and perjury in the Valerie Plame leak case. The news announcers spoke of jurors crying, muted victory by the prosecution, and a resigned Libby allowed to visit home until his sentence began. Indeed, even the impartial and experienced news people at NPR seemed to sound a note of finality to the issues brought up in the Plame leak case.

Unfortunately, Libby's indictment is only a superficial victory. It will satisfy the Republicans concerned about the Libby issue and the Bush Administration's air of secrecy in the 2008 elections. It will also satisfy the suddenly conciliatory Democrats, who are quickly mastering the art of presenting symbols, not realities, of progress to the American people. Finally, with the exception of a push by mainstream media announcers like Andrea Mitchell for a pardon, the good people at broadcast and cable news networks seem satisfied. They can move onto the next chapter in their hard-hitting series on Anna Nicole Smith.

Americans should not be, and by most accounts are not, satisfied by this indictment. According to a recent CNN poll, only 18 percent of Americans support the pardon of Lewis "Scooter" Libby. As well, there is a strong breeze of discontent throughout the United States as regards both parties and the free flowing pork projects wafting from the Capitol building. While the "experts" may be satisfied with the Libby indictment, Americans like myself only see it as the tip of the iceberg.

It is time to teach lawbreakers in our own government that their trumped-up importance is no defense against reason.

Credit: Michael Kwaja

Copyright: Morgue File

Takeaways
  • The Scooter Libby indictment is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to exposing corruption.
  • Americans need to push within both major parties for reform of the entire system.
  • The judicial system needs to go after all offenders, not "example setters."
Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
Just marginally better?

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 AM

 
Scott, I tend to do that. I go off on flights of fancy before getting to my point. I agree with your annoyance over the Anna Nicole Smith fiasco. It isn't news and it isn't entertainment. The Anna Nicole Smith story, the Britney Spears saga, and anything else having to do with the frivolous are wasting the public's valuable time. If we spent as much time or energy on improving our communities as we do talking about "The Apprentice" or "American Idol," things may be marginally better in America.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 8:03:00 PM

 
Wow. I thought you were wildly all over the place in this article, but you bring it together well at the end. I think you're dead on. The general public should be outraged, but for some reason isn't. I've been annoyed at how much coverage I've seen on Anna Nicole Smith and how little I've seen on the Libby case.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 8:03:00 PM

 
Tim offers an extremely potent observation. And while I agree with and appreciate the point being offered in this article, I would suggest the correct terms be used when offering op-ed on current events. There's a bit of a difference between an indictment and a conviction.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 7:03:00 AM

 
Accountability. Bush administration. You see, even I can't manage to fit those three words into one sentence. The immutable laws of physics will not allow it.

Posted on 03/15/2007 at 4:03:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On