Hillary Clinton: Is Homosexuality Immoral?

Answer the Question!

Just as Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) takes a solid lead in the Democrats' presidential polls, she made the choice to avoid a question that could alienate those one-issue voters who are focused on gay rights for 2008.

Clinton leads in the most recent poll by 15 percent. Senator Barack Obama trails in second and former Vice President Al Gore, who is not even running, and former Senator and Vice-Presidential candidate John Edwards are
Hillary Clinton: Is Homosexuality Immoral?
 tied for third. Neither Clinton nor Obama have yet been willing to challenge the controversial statements made by Peter Pace on Monday regarding homosexuality's immorality, though Clinton has said she does not share the view, "[P]lain and simple... It is inappropriate to inject such person views into this public policy matter..." It is important to note that both Senators have also spent a fair amount of time campaigning to the religious population of America, appealing to this often right-leaning constituency as life-long churchgoers with a solid base in their beliefs in God.

Clinton has courted gay-rights advocates throughout her campaigning; only two weeks ago, she told the audience at a Human Rights Campaign (HRC) gathering that she was proud to stand with them in supporting gay rights. When ABC News asked her to comment on Pace's comment, however, she replied, "Well, I'm going to leave that to others to conclude."

While a Clinton spokesperson has stated that Clinton "obviously" disagrees with Pace, the Senator herself has notably gone without truly answering the question: Does she believe homosexuality to be immoral? Perhaps she is counting the votes first - should she alienate the gay rights activists or the religious, both of whom she has worked to court to answer, "Clinton," in a poll.

Clinton's spokesman, Philippe Reins, said the New York senator "obviously" disagrees with Pace and that everyone, including the general, "has the right to be wrong, but should not inject their personal beliefs into public policy."

Related information
  • Senator Clinton initally refused to comment on Pace's statement that homosexuality is immoral
  • Her statement, which came much later, still leaves something to be desired
  • A voter cannot really tell where Clinton really stands on gay rights issues
 
Comments 1 - 6 of 6  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Interesting article

Posted on 08/07/2007 at 10:08:00 PM

Very interesting, I find the Democratic Party to be performing an awkward dance with the gay community.

Posted on 06/15/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

My prediction is that if the election comes down to her and Mitt Romney, Mitt might win because his conservatism might appear more moral to people. It's slippery slope.

Posted on 06/05/2007 at 5:06:00 AM

I don't think it's entirely policy that caused her to avoid that question. I think she wants to stay away from brining religious dogma into the election and she's the lightening rod that could bring it in, not Edwards. She will stand up for gay Americans because it's wrong to restrict the freedoms of Americans needlessly. I also think she tries to refrain from judging others whenever she can, only her husband is a weak spot.

Posted on 06/05/2007 at 5:06:00 AM

Dodging the question is lame in my opinion. It is a yes-or-no question, do you believe in homosexuality or not? Clinton shares this problem with her husband. Did you engage in sexual intercourse with that woman, yes or no?

Posted on 05/20/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

Good article. She's definitely playing to moderates over her base, which is a wise strategy now. It's a tough call. I think she might actually be better off dodging the question.

Posted on 03/31/2007 at 12:03:00 AM

Comments 1 - 6 of 6