Key Factors Surrounding the Debate of Rescheduling Marijuana in the United States
By E. Jayne Forish, published Mar 24, 2007
Published Content: 30 Total Views: 9,123 Favorited By: 0 CPs
Advocates of rescheduling marijuana feel that the substance does not have a high potential for abuse. This conclusion is based on scientific experiments in which laboratory animals do no self-administer the drug. The addictive quality of craving the substance is not present.
Marijuana has also been accepted by scientists, physicians, patients, and others to have medical value. For example, it aids cancer patients by fighting off nausea. Currently, twelve states have recognized marijuana's medical potential. Additionally, over 2,500 physicians presently recommend the use of marijuana to their patients. There are approximately 35,000 patients in the United States who legally use marijuana for a variety of medical reasons.
Rescheduling advocates also claim that marijuana is not a risk to one's safety. The exception to this is the damage done to the lungs and throat. This damage is equivalent to and possibly less than that of smoking tobacco cigarettes. Marijuana's spectrum of side effects, advocates argue, is equivalent to the effects of many prescription medications.
You may also like...
- Medical Marijuana: The Pros and Cons
- Judge's Recommendation Raises Hope for Marijuana Studies
- Argument for the Legalization of Marijuana
- $1.8 Million Marijuana Garden Lands Minnesota Man in Jail
- Study: Researchers Find that Marijuana May Alleviate Skin Allergies
- High court rules against medical marijuana
- New Ammunition in the Campaign to Legalize Marijuana
- Marijuana: Taming the Beast
- High on Health
- Legalized Marijuana: a Gold Mine for the Canadian Government
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On

