Ironic (Colonial) Developments in Soyinka's Death and the King's Horseman
The earliest example of this can be found at the beginning of the first two acts of the play. The beginning of Act 1 shows Elesin and a number of other characters speaking elegantly in poetics, mainly about how Elesin's self-sacrifice will help uphold ancient tradition and maintain a sort of cosmic balance within the tribe as the next generation begins to faze into the society.
The beginning of Act 2 however shows Mr. and Mrs. Pilkings disrespecting ancient African customs by reducing spiritual garbs/masks to masquerade props, belittling African natives on their own soil and subjecting them to insults, and speaking in a rather plain linguistic tone in contrast to the poetry that was the dialogue of Act 1. The Pilkings' are shown to be selfish and insensitive to African customs and thought and the native Africans, acting as the antithesis to the features which the Pilkings' embody, come off as much more civilized than the colonial forces which use their "superior civilization" as a means to justify colonial imposition. The justification and intention behind colonialism then shifts within the context of the play and instead of seeking to advance or educate African culture, colonialism seeks to force to Africans to act as stupidly as the British.
You may also like...
- Grande Colonial Hotel: La Jolla, California
- Responses of Filipinos to Spanish Colonial Rule
- Colonial Williamsburg at Christmas; A Once in a Lifetime Treat!
- British Colonial Design Style: Furniture and History
- Visiting Colonial Williamsburg and Jamestown Settlement
- Freedom and Colonial American Women
- Colonial Williamsburg
- Guide to Colonial Williamsburg In Virginia
- Visiting Colonial Williamsburg
- An Introduction to Post-Colonial Theory
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On


