Is Torture Wrong?
Can it Be Ethical to Use Bad Means (torture) to Achieve a Good End?
By Scott Schlimmer, published Apr 02, 2007
Published Content: 97 Total Views: 229,302 Favorited By: 22 CPs
Embed:
Simple ethical questions are easy to answer. Is torture wrong? Of course it is. But simple ethical questions aren't really questions. It reminds me of the old Coaches Versus Cancer tournament, whose proceeds go to fighting cancer. We have yet to see a Coaches Supporting Cancer tournament.Sadly, most people's thinking stops there. Is torture wrong? Yes. I'm an ethical person. I'm done. I'd like to pose a real ethical question.
Is Torture Wrong?
Consider this hypothetical. You're a law enforcement agent and you get a tip that there's a plan to blow up the Earth. You expect that they'll detonate a set of nuclear weapons, destroying the world in a couple days. Then you catch somebody who knows about the plan, and knows how to stop it. But the person refuses to divulge the details. For clarity, let's say this plan is 100% sure. There is no doubt.
If you torture this person, you will be able to get the information from them, foil the plan, and save the world.
Should you torture this person to save the entire world? This question is as easy as the simple "Is torture wrong?" question. Of course you should. But wait, I thought torture was bad. In this scenario, we might even say that not torturing would be wrong. How's that for turning the tables?
Ethics: Bad Means for a Good End
What gives? If torturing is wrong, how were we able to find a situation when not torturing is wrong? It's because ethical questions are not as simple as people make them. We've uncovered a situation where you need to use bad means for a good end.
To measure the ethics, you need to do a cost-benefit analysis and compare the bad means and the good end.
First, there's the bad means, the torture. Are you doing something wrong by torturing this person? Yes. Torture is bad, and you are doing a moderately bad thing. If you want to quantify, we'll call it a -4.
Second, there's the good end, the saving the world. If you don't take action, the world ends. But if you torture, you save the world. That's a very good end. We can quantify that as a +10.

Is Torture Wrong?
Fox News raises an interesting question. Even more interesting, when is torture ethical and when is it wrong? And why?
Credit: Fox News
Copyright: Fox News
You may also like...
- Ethics of Torture
- Abuse of the Elderly: How Widespread is ...
- Direct-to-DVD Wrong Turn 2 Leads the Vie...
- What is Prescriptivism and How Does it R...
- Where is Our Country Heading?
- Why Baring Your Breasts Isn't Such a Bad...
- Book Review: Torture: A Collection by Sa...
- Working for Mr. Wrong
- Lethal Injection is Anything but Humane
- Giving an End to a Torture is Better Tha...
Takeaways
- Is torture wrong? Of course it is.
- Would you torture one person to save 100? Most likely, yes.
- Ethical issues aren't as simple as people make them.
Did You Know?
Sometimes, it's ethical to do a bad thing (use bad means) to achieve a good end.Today's Most Commented On
Advertisment

Scott Schlimmer
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/17/2007 at 1:04:00 AM
Jennifer Thompson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/15/2007 at 11:04:00 PM
Murielle Stephenson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 10:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 9:04:00 PM
Murielle Stephenson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 2:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 PM
Murielle Stephenson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 1:04:00 PM
Murielle Stephenson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 12:04:00 PM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 12:04:00 AM
Scott S
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/04/2007 at 12:04:00 AM
Murielle Stephenson
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/02/2007 at 11:04:00 AM
Rusty
Add a Comment
Posted on 04/02/2007 at 10:04:00 AM