Do You Want Pork with That?
Secure Rural Schools Act (Forest County Payments): Provides $400 million to be used for one-time payments to be allocated to states under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000. ThisLIHEAP: Provides $400 million for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP).
Vaccine Compensation: Provides $50 million to compensate individuals for injuries caused by the H5N1 vaccine, which is a flu vaccine.
Payment to Widow of Rep. Norwood: Provides $165,200 to Gloria W. Norwood, the widow of former Rep. Charlie Norwood (R-GA), an RSC Member, who passed away last month. In the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2005 (H.R. 1268), Congress provided $162,100 to Doris Matsui, the widow of former Rep. Robert Matsui.
Capitol Power Plant: Provides $50 million to the Capitol Power Plant for asbestos abatement and safety improvements.
Liberia: Provides that money appropriated for FY 2007 for the Bilateral Economic Assistance program at the Department of Treasury may be used to assist Liberia in retiring its debt arrearages to the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the African Development Bank.
SCHIP: Provides $750 million to the Secretary of HHS to provide assistance to the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) "shortfall states,", in the form of an amount "as the Secretary determines will eliminate the estimated shortfall." This provision is direct spending that is essentially capped at $750 million and designated as an emergency to avoid PAYGO constraints.
Minimum Wage Increase: Increases the federal minimum wage from $5.15-per-hour to $7.25-per-hour over two-plus years-a 41% increase. Yields $16.5 billion in private-sector costs over five years.
Tax Increases and Shifts: Implements several tax increases and shifts, including: denying the lowest maximum capital gains tax rate for certain minors and adults, extending the suspension of interest payments due to the IRS, and adjusting the deadlines for corporate estimated tax payments. Costs taxpayers $1.380 billion over the FY2007-FY2017 period.
Type in Your Comments Below
A. James
07/19/2007
They put in all the pork to garner more votes for their "strategy". It's sad when our reps will only vote yes on a bill *if* there's something in it for them. Why can't a bill have NO pork? Why can't they actually vote on the issue at hand? Our Congress is a JOKE. And what was it the dems were running on...getting rid of earmarks immediately? Ugh. They are all crooked. Vote Ron Paul 2008!!!! ;)
Jeanne Marie Kerns
05/09/2007
Great article :-)
Jeff Musall
04/06/2007
Arrgh! It is mind boggling that there are people in this country still STUPID enough to believe anything Bush says...keep right on voting against your best interests, and push America right on into corporate/christo fascism!
Heather B.
04/06/2007
This is such a waste of time. Bush has said he will veto any bill with a timetable for leaving Iraq, so putting that in any bill is just guaranteeing that it won't pass and become law. Democrats are wasting their time on this.
Chaotic Ramblings
04/01/2007
More crap, or more truth? It depends on which side you are on. I could obviously say the same of many comments on this article. The article stands on its own. The Democrats should not have created such a bogus emergency appropriation's bill. They should have done the right thing instead of playing politics with our troops lives and wellbeing.
Melissa F.
03/29/2007
More crap from another right-winger. I refuse to give ANY amount of respect to an article when all it is meant to do is completely bash the left side. There is a way to be opinionated without being brash and disrespectful. When you want to write respectful work, I will comment accordingly on that, but until then - the first sentence is the most respect you will get from me.
Susan Gardner
03/29/2007
Ramble on, my Great American friend. You're right on!
Don Lee
03/29/2007
Kristina, if Bush lied, so did Clinton, the UN, the UK and everybody else who knew about the WMD's. Saddam killed his own people with them, or had you forgotten? Jeff, if the prez. o.k.'s the pork bill and withdrawl date, he won't be serving the best interests of the troops. He would be like a liberal, pandering to a bunch of moronic loudmouths who just want to lose this war for political reasons. You know, Jeff, people like you....
Jamie K. Wilson
03/29/2007
My brother's in Afghanistan. My husband's been told that he may be asked to volunteer for Iraq ground duty, even though he's Navy personnel. If the troops don't get funded, no one's coming home; instead, the Army and other services will tighten their belts. My brother will stay longer because there won't be relief troops. It will be far more likely that my husband will go to Iraq because Army personnel will not have the manpower to send instead. If, however, Bush were to sign the bill as is and we get a withdrawal timetable, Al Qaeda can turn the resources and manpower currently in Iraq to attacking America directly. It's an obvious strategy. Of the two, I'd rather Bush stick to his guns here, even though two people I love like my life will be at more risk longer.
Chaotic Patriot
03/29/2007
Thank you Mister Patriot, Manda and Gipsy. I was pleasantly surprised by your positive comments. It's great to know there are others out there that share my opinions. I took a trip over to Al Jazeera (http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/EAC8B0A0-CA11-4035-907F-5E12BCC58FA0.htm) and read their opinion on how weak they think our President is after this debacle. Ridiculous!
Comments 1 - 10 (of 23)
Next >>



