"Darwin's God" : Pigeon Feathers and Faith

reasonfaith
reasonfaith
  • Published Content: 69
  • Total Views: 32,704
  • Favorited By: 2 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites

Opinion Piece on Robin Marantz Henig's "New York Times Magazine" Article of March 4, 2007 on Darwinian Explanations as to "Why Do We Believe?"

On March 4, 2007, the New York Times Magazine ran an extraordinary article written by Robin Marantz Henig entitled "Darwin's God" and "Why Do We Believe?" Ms. Henig is a graduate of Northwestern and Cornell and has published many science articles dealing with topics of interest to those who h
ave a theological or philosophical interest in the current faith and reason controversy . This excellent essay is about recent scientific studies into whether our brains are hard-wired by human cognition to believe in the supernatural and whether this was an adaptive and evolutionary condition to benefit humanity over time. This extensive and well-written essay should be read by anyone interested in the current faith and reason conversations or those studying the science versus religion debates. As expected, it has caused a back-lash among scientific atheists such as Hawkins, "The God Delusion" and others.

In Henig's article she makes clear that scientists are not trying to show that God exists, but simply why the belief in God and religion have remained such a permanent fixture in our consciousness psychologically. We know that the "fear and flight "response was necessary to the survival of civilizations, but if belief in God is irrational as some claim (for example Hawkins and Harris "The End of Faith") or just a delusion, than what purpose would that serve? Fearing the unreal, fleeing an unfounded figment of the imagination would not make much sense for evolutionary adaptation and further confounds logic.

 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
for someone that not believe on god...could they ever thought how human exist. if they say evolution from monkey or whatever, tell how those monkeys exist. its weird if there still people that didnt believe on god existence

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 1:03:16 AM

In short the capacity for belief in God is as inherent in people as the capacity for faulty logic.

Posted on 08/25/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

I also find it commendable that scientists would devote time to understand why belief is so common. I don't find the commonality of belief to be proof of God, however. I think that belief in God arises out of our lower reasoning, not our higher. People once believed thunder and lightning were supernatural too. Such limited thinking reminds me of a dog who is afraid of the vacuum cleaner and is too scared to investigate the loud beast-better safe than sorry, right? We accept supernatural beliefs because they are simple and easier to process than responsibly accepting the unknowable. In math we label the unknown as "X" until we prove its value. We don't assume X is 7 or 64 because it is more convenient to confront a number than a variable. People have no such scruples about God.

Posted on 08/25/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC