Supporting Our Troops: Move America Forward Commercial on YouTube

Chaotic Ramblings
Chaotic Ramblings
  • Published Content: 14
  • Total Views: 0
  • Favorited By: 16 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites

Pro-American Groups Stand Up to Anti-American Groups

There's a new movement in the United States today; a new movement that is growing and gaining strength with every moment. The silent majority has found its voice and it has been gaining volume in amazing leaps and bounds. There is a roaring, now, that cannot be ignored and as Michelle Malkin said, "
Supporting Our Troops: Move America Forward Commercial on YouTube
the silent majority is silent no more."

Move America Forward and the Gathering of Eagles are grassroot, pro-American, pro-troop organizations working to demonstrate support for our country and our troops. Frustration with the liberal media and disgust with the anti-American, pro-surrender crowd in Washington have risen to a crescendo of red-blooded Americans shouting, "These colors don't run!", "Support our troops!" and "Stop destroying our nation!"

Scores of Americans are sick and tired of the ridiculous politicking going on in Washington D.C.. They have decided to stand up for themselves since many in Washington D.C. seem to be incapable of doing the job for which they were elected. Many Americans are tired of hearing about pork-laden appropriation's bills saddled with Iraq "surrender" dates that were meant to be "clean" bills to fund our troops. They are mad as hell and they aren't going to take it any more!

A new commercial has been created to support this grassroots, pro-American, pro-troops movement and it can be viewed at YouTube (here). This commercial says it all. If you would like to help get this commercial on national television, you can contribute money at MoveAmericaForward.Org. You can also copy the code from YouTube and embed it in your MySpace page or website.

Move America Forward and the Gathering of Eagles have just begun to make their presence known in the United States. When the anti-war, pro-surrender crowd marched on Washington D.C. on March 17, pro-troop, pro-American groups were there to greet them. It is reported that some 30,000 people came from all across the United States to stand up for our troops and to protect our national monuments from desecration.

  • Move America Forward
  • Gathering of Eagles
  • Michelle Malkin's Blog
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 67 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
Hey, CR, don't forget your promise to Heather. I know they've found some WMD -- heck, they've been using chlorine gas lately, for that matter. At any rate, I may have some info if you need it.

Posted on 04/07/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

I'll make that my next article, Heather. Thanks for the idea.

Posted on 04/06/2007 at 4:04:00 PM

I'm married to a Christian soldier, and he has my full support. I just don't believe there is any need for him to be sent to Iraq. You can support the troops while still wanting the war to end so that they can come home to their families. Would you mind posting links to some articles about the WMD's being found? I hadn't heard yet that any had been uncovered, but certainly if those have been, they are just as dangerous as nukes.

Posted on 04/06/2007 at 4:04:00 PM

Several news reports have shown that there are biological and chemical WMD's being found in Iraq. Do these WMD's not "count"? They can do as much, if not more, damage than nuclear weapons.

Posted on 04/06/2007 at 2:04:00 PM

Also, the Office of Special Plans, conceived of by Rumsfeld and Cheney etc, is known to have coerced the intelligence community into making dubious conclusions about Iraq, which is why in the intelligence presented to Congress was full of bullshit. In fact, the State Departments conculusions about Iraq virtually debunked all the trumped up WMD intel. Even if they didn't lie, the simple fact that the White House was SO WRONG about WMD should be enough to anger you. If there was any doubt in their minds they should not have so wrecklessly invaded Iraq.

Posted on 04/05/2007 at 5:04:00 AM

Clinton was wrong about WMD too, because he had adopted the regime change policy as well. Scott Ritter had been trying to get the truth out, which is that Saddam had destroyed the unaccounted for weapons after the Gulf War, but the White House tried to smear him. Hans Blix has also said that "unaccounted for does not mean weapons exist". As for Niger--that was known to be false by the White House itself before Bush's famous utterance in teh State of the Union. In fact, they had removed it from an earlier speech because they thought it was false. Why is it so hard for you to believe they lied?

Posted on 04/05/2007 at 5:04:00 AM

Despite Valerie Plame's and her husband's claims, British Parliamentary reports found there was credible intelligence Iraq had attempted to acquire 500 tons of uranium oxide, yellowcake, from Niger in 1999. The Butler Report of 2002 said that someone had created forged documents and "openly" distributed them in the hopes of discrediting that intelligence, but it didn't work. The British saw through the forgeries and stood by their claims.

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 5:04:00 PM

Quoting President Clinton on December 16, 1998: "The mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. The purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States and indeed the interests of the people throughout the Middle East and around the world. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons."

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 5:04:00 PM

Paul, it's forgotten.

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 12:04:00 PM

Thanks, Daniel! I salute you for getting out there and standing up for America and our troops!

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 11:04:00 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 67 Next >>

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC

Most Comments Today