Rosie O'Donnell's Conspiracy Theory: Bill O'Reilly Responds

Anthony Caroto
Anthony Caroto
  • Published Content: 89
  • Total Views: 188,261
  • Favorited By: 24 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites
She's offensive is speech and physical nature, but to be in her position and to support a 9/11-related conspiracy theory takes a lot of guts. She's put the ball in play for the public forum, igniting talk radio switchboards and cable news networks. The theories are out there for mass consumption- so
Rosie O'Donnell's Conspiracy Theory: Bill O'Reilly Responds
me of which present a strong challenge to the current history books.

This new round of trouble with O'Donnell began with a March 15th blog entry titled "wtc 7". In it, O'Donnell presented the "facts" to what may have brought down the third building on September 11th, 2001. "Hold on folks, here we go," she types before unleashing a brief list of probabilities, most of which came directly from the cinematic bible for conspiracy theorist, Loose Change.

From Wikipedia: Loose Change is an internet film written and directed by Dylan Avery, produced by Korey Rowe with researcher Jason Bermas. The film presents a 9/11 conspiracy theory to set forth the claim that elements within the United States government planned and executed the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. It is one of the most watched films on the Internet, with over 10 million viewers in 2006.

Coincidentally, an Internet film titled Screw Loose Change is also available. This version, obviously, is a direct challenge to the previously stated "facts" in Loose Change.

Rosie again presented her opinions on live television via her show, The View. Her New York styled "fuck you" glare annoys me. Her rant is far from believable, even if its fact. Hillary Clinton would be proud.

Bill O'Reilly, host of the O'Reilly Factor, took her to task during his March 29th broadcast. His guests for the segment were Bernard Goldberg, a best selling author and political commentator for Fox News, and Jane Hall, also a political commentator for Fox News.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 27 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
Dear Mr. TIMOTHY CAMPBELL I hope u know u are utterly Asinine. And you are most defiantly a coward!

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 7:07:00 PM

She lie's, she started it, and I cant respect her. She made her political argument on a morning show. And she pick's on a pregnant girl, and was the stupid wife on her own show. I am sry I do not respect un supported evidence, you are all seculars out there right? Well the argument u make against God Almighty is no evidence! What's up I need to hear somthin, yall are behind in my book? Something supported by people who were there, that's says 9-11 was set up. And ill show u evidence for "GOD".

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 6:07:00 PM

The media in the US makes you ignorant. I know it cos I used to live there and now I am far far away from the homeland. Read www.savethemales.ca and you'll find answers. 911 was an inside job. Period.

Posted on 05/17/2007 at 12:05:00 AM

If Rosie is wrong, that means every Skyscraper is in danger of Collapsing killing everyone inside. And anyone who thinks they should NOT be torn down is a murderer. What the Government seems to be saying, is that a small plane can crash into the Sears Tower, the impact can remove all the fireproof coating on the steal beams and the fuel can make it melt and the Building collapse. The WTC is suppose to handle a impact from a plane. All skyscrapers are, according to code. Planes crash into tall Buildings. They are called accidents. Now that they know that the Sear tower can collapse, what are they doing to dismantle all the skyscrapers? And what Happened to all those Airport Surveillance videos showing the terrorist getting on the planes? How come none of the 911 calls supposedly made from the planes, had no people screaming or talking in the back ground? You would think there would at least be a terrorist yelling "get the fock off the phone." Why would anyone hang up a phone if the

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 10:04:00 AM

Bernard Goldberg commenting on "hateful nonsense"? Mama mia! And O'Reilly trying to "debate" others by stating that they've lost viewers? O'Reilly (and Fox News in general) has lost nearly 30% from their peak, more than any other cable news network. That one won't stand and it shouldn't anyway -- the number of viewers a station has says nothing about their credibility. If it did, Fox News' credibility has dropped dramatically (30%); to use these things to back up your point is nothing but lazy. They should simply be focusing on Rosie and her statements instead of trying to turn this into political points, us against them, big bad network television against the underdog (in this case, Fox News is supposed to be an underdog?). I do agree completely with their presumed conclusion -- that these conspiracy theories are loosely based, easily discredited and created by those with a bias and an agenda that perfectly explain their ideas of this "conspiracy." Fox News should be the "bigge

Posted on 04/14/2007 at 12:04:00 AM

This is my first time here,so I didn't realize the content was limited. Start with the comment beginning with "Here is a simple question...", and end with "negative to their own society" . Free your mind of influence created by fear tactics and vague,unsubstantiated hypothesis/conspiracy theories. Stand up and lead; refuse to be part of the flock.

Posted on 04/09/2007 at 8:04:00 AM

negative to their own society) 2:Oil emirates, preferably of anti-western/anti-zionist lean 3: In some instances, cattle and/or dogs, (animals in general, although mainly those which can be domesticated) 4. The dead within their society 5. Women 6. Homo-sexuals... oh , wait a minute, I'm sorry they consider homo-sexuals as unnatural and as abominations to their faith. I can go on and on, as her hypocrisies and flat-out lies are numerous (beyond belief), but why bother. If she is your "Flag-Ship" of cultural and political ideology, good luck and honestly, good riddance. The irony is that our BRAVE TROOPS are out there fighting and in some cases sacrificing their lives so that a blowhard such as this disgrace can spew her Anti-American propaganda

Posted on 04/09/2007 at 7:04:00 AM

Here is a simple question. Has this treasonous media figurehead EVER supported anything that was Pro-American? And I'm not talking about her so-called charity events. She will gladly defend terrorists and dictatorships,(but of course, they (muslims) are not as harmful and murderous as Judeo Christians) yet spew venom and hatred on everything our country, and the beliefs of any kind of religious sect, stands for. Obviously she is very bitter about the majority of the country looking down upon, and in general, not accepting of the homo-sexual lifestyle choice. Well guess what, rosie, the radical militant islamic entities you defend would actually have the homo-sexual "demo-graphic" wiped out entirely,and they inherently see it as a scourge upon their society. Here is the echelon (that means the societal power structure for those "The View" viewers who actually have the mental capacity to read this); 1: Men as a whole (regardless of intellect, stature, or actual contribution positive or

Posted on 04/09/2007 at 7:04:00 AM

Here is a simple question. Has this treasonous media figurehead EVER supported anything that was Pro-American? And I'm not talking about her so-called charity events. She will gladly defend terrorists and dictatorships,(but of course, they (muslims) are not as harmful and murderous as Judeo Christians) yet spew venom and hatred on everything our country, and the beliefs of any kind of religious sect, stands for. Obviously she is very bitter about the majority of the country looking down upon, and in general, not accepting of the homo-sexual lifestyle choice. Well guess what, rosie, the radical militant islamic entities you defend would actually have the homo-sexual "demo-graphic" wiped out entirely,and they inherently see it as a scourge upon their society. Here is the echelon (that means the societal power structure for those "The View" viewers who actually have the mental capacity to read this); 1: Men as a whole (regardless of intellect, stature, or actual contribution positive or

Posted on 04/09/2007 at 6:04:00 AM

HMMMMMMMMMMMM I wonder if President Bush legalized same sex marraige , would this lunatic change her tune about our President

Posted on 04/06/2007 at 7:04:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 27 Next >>

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC

Most Comments Today