Highest Court Takes the Bong Hits 4 Jesus Case

Juvenile Prank, or Protected Speech?

By E. Farnum, published Apr 03, 2007
Published Content: 16  Total Views: 6,522  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.8 of 5
The "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case has been presented to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2002 Juneau high school student Joseph Frederick had been excused from class along with the other students to see the Olympic Torch on its way to Salt Lake City. He went across the street from the school and unfurled a banner that read, "Bong Hits 4 Jesus." He was suspended for violating the schools drug policy. Presently Fredericks is a teacher, and now says the sign was meaningless and that it was just a test of his rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard a case of this type in 1969 where a school principle suspended students for wearing armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. In Tinker v. Des Moines school district, the case came down to the fundamental question: Do the First Amendment rights of free speech extend to symbolic speech by students in public schools? The Tinkers won. In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the students had the right to wear armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. I don't think this juvenile stunt is quite the same thing.

Where's the protest? In 2002 Frederick, by his own admission, stated he thought the banner was funny and that he just wanted to get on TV. The lawyers are turning this into the issue with Frederick now saying it's about free speech. Students who disrupt the learning process should be dealt with according to school policies. Ok, the incident happened across the street from the school, not in the classroom, but it was still disruptive and sent a pro-drug message to minors. What if the banner had read Bong hits for Mohammed, or Buddha. Would we still be hearing the case?

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Should this apply to children who may not even know what they are saying? In another free speech case, Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 1988 the Supreme Court stressed that students in public schools do not always have the same First Amendment rights as adults in other situations.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
The silly things we American's take to court!

Posted on 06/29/2007 at 2:06:00 AM

 
Free speech is a tricy thing. There is a lot of speech I would like to suppress. I know there are a lot of people who want to shut me up. It comes with a price: you have see and hear what you despise in exchange for your speech. This comment is one example. LOL!

Posted on 06/28/2007 at 2:06:00 PM

 
Snap!

Posted on 04/06/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

 
Oh pshaw. I think it's funny as hell and should have just been ignored in the first place.

Posted on 04/04/2007 at 7:04:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On