Buying a Home in Unincorporated Areas of San Francisco and Oakland
Lower Taxes Can Also Mean Fewer Services
By Carol Anne Carroll, published Mar 10, 2006
Published Content: 175 Total Views: 254,624 Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:
As you search for a home, you may have heard the names beyond San Francisco and Oakland. Names such as Cherryland. El Sobrante. Fairview. Rodeo. San Lorenzo.You may have even found a home there, one you think you would like to buy. But whatever you do in your research, unlike San Francisco and Oakland, don't look for City Hall. In the case of these areas, it simply doesn't exist.
The East Bay has many unincorporated areas, as they are known. Simply put, these areas are not part of an incorporated city.
While this sounds a bit disconcerting, home buyers may actually prefer purchasing a home in these areas, according to real estate agent Victoria DeBray. Based in Pleasanton, DeBray herself lives in Castro Valley, another unincorporated area.
"One of the positive aspects of living in an unincorporated area is that you don't pay city taxes," DeBray explains. In the case of a home purchase, this can actually mean a significant reduction in a normally hefty closing cost - the transfer tax, which is assessed by incorporated cities like San Francisco and Oakland. (Interestingly enough, San Francisco holds the unique distinction of being both a city and a county.) "There is no city transfer tax in unincorporated areas," she explains. "And that can be significant. The cost of a transfer tax can actually break a deal."
In a traditional housing market, home buyers and sellers split the cost of the transfer tax, which often runs anywhere from $2,000 to $5,000 and up.
However, the East Bay market has been anything but a buyer's market, and sellers have found that, particularly in multiple bid situations, the buyer is often willing to pick up the entire cost of the transfer tax to ensure they are the successful bidder. "In a seller's market, the seller often won't accept paying for the transfer tax," DeBray notes.
For basic services, such as sidewalk repairs and emergency response, residents in unincorporated areas rely on Alameda County, whereas in cities such as San Francisco and Oakland, they rely on various city departments for these services.
You may also like...
- Hotel Guide: San Francisco, CA
- A Review of San Francisco, California
- Activities and Attractions in San Francisco
- Visiting San Francisco's Japantown: A Weekend Getaway
- How to Choose a Wedding Planner in San Francisco, California
- Top Cooking Schools in San Francisco
- Discount Wedding Dresses in San Francisco, California
- The Top Burrito Joints in San Francisco
- San Francisco Restaurant Guide
- The Best Romantic French Restaurants in San Francisco
Takeaways
- 1. Unincorporated areas generally have lower property taxes.
- 2. Regulations are not necessarily more lax in unincorporated areas.
- 3. Since California schools are state-funded, there is often little impact on school quality.
Did You Know?
Some communities, such as Castro Valley, have repeatedly rejected incorporation.
Resources
- *Victoria DeBray can be reached at 925-847-8900, or visit her web site at www.victoriadebray.com. *For more information on County ordinances affecting unincorporated areas, visit www.acgov.org (for Alameda County), www.co.contra-costa.ca.us (for Contra Costa County), or www.san-joaquin.ca.us for San Joaquin County. All three counties have unincorporated areas.
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On

