Industry Leaders Propose Code of Conduct for Bloggers, Some Say Censorship

Censorship or Civility

By Donna Porter, published Apr 11, 2007
Published Content: 170  Total Views: 383,530  Favorited By: 245 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
Should bloggers be held to standards of conduct or would a code of conduct be a form of censorship?

This is a question currently under avid debate. Some industry leaders propose a code of conduct is needed. An effort stimulated by recently publicized cases of death threats, defamation and other cyberbullying tactics.

Advocates include well-known book publisher Tim O'Reilly who recently began working with Jimmy Wales, creator of Wikipedia, to craft a set of guidelines that could influence online discussion and debate. (New York Times).

The proposal focuses on banning anonymous comments, now commonly left on blogs, and reinforcement for blog owners who wish to delete defamatory or threatening content.

While it may seem logical that a blog owner could do as they please and delete nasty posts, repercussions for bloggers who execute the presumed right are on the rise.

Just recently tech author Kathy Sierra, received death threats in part because she supports the right to delete improper blog posts. Opponents refer to this behavior as censorship.

O'Reilly, a purported friend of Sierra, tells the NY Times that such incidents "gives us an opportunity to change the level of expectations that people have about what's acceptable online." His recommendations can be found on his company's blog. (radar.oreilly.com).

Wales followed suit and posted the guidelines to his site, (blogging.wikia.com), to elicit feedback and consensus as to what "constitutes civil behavior online".

The two tech industry gurus propose "several sets of guidelines for conduct" and seals of approval represented by logos.

This enables the code of conduct to be flexible for different types of blogs. For instance, some blogs are conducive to anonymous postings. But the hope is to differentiate among the level of discourse readers will find and bloggers accept.

Interested bloggers would pick a set of guidelines to follow and receive the appropriate logo designating their blogging policy.

Industry Leaders Propose Code of Conduct for Bloggers, Some Say Censorship

Freedom of speech versus censorship

Credit: © Darko Novakovic - FOTOLIA

Copyright: licence granted by © Darko Novakovic - FOTOLIA

Takeaways
  • A Code of Conduct for bloggers may improve civility and accountability on the Net.
  • The hurdles to implement such a code are enormous.
  • Some argue proposed guidelines are a form of censorship.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
 
I don't think there should be a code of cunduct on bloggers. we write what we feel, and nobdy should tell us what that is.

Posted on 04/21/2007 at 4:04:00 PM

 
Very well stated Roselyn, and Vapour I think you have an interesting considertion about this issue, too.

Posted on 04/19/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

 
(continued) Free speech is one of our most important rights and should never be taken away. With that right, however, comes responsibility and repercussions for our actions.

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

 
I believe blog hosting companies should have the right to decide what is allowed on the sites they own (much the way companies such as AC are able to limit the material they publish so as not to allow hate speech or R-rated articles). I also believe individual blog writers have the the right to choose what goes on their blog--including in the comments section. They are private individuals and companies. The space belongs to them, and they should be able to choose what they will or won't allow, just like they would in their own homes. That said, if the government sets guidelines and restricts what people are allowed to say, that is a violation of free speech. They have no business doing any such thing. Consequences for what we say and do, however, should be in play the same way they are in face-to-face life. Stalking and threats online should be prosecuted just like they are in our physical lives. Free speech is one of our most important rights and should never be taken away. With that

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

 
What we write is what people know about us, it is exactly what we want them to know about us, because as they read what we write, they judge what we are- O'Reilly is about taste and being smart- which makes sense, put your best foot forward...for me that means taking it out of my mouth...but then putting it forward...as you do in every one of your excellent(!) articles! -Dana

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 4:04:00 PM

 
Industry as champions of morality. I shudder at the thought. This is about money it always is.

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 1:04:00 AM

 
Thought provoking. I think the internet has gotten out of hand. Al Quida uses it for communication and propaganda. Pedophiles seem to thrive on it. Yet what to do, where to draw the line. Good questions.

Posted on 04/14/2007 at 2:04:00 PM

 
Very interesting report

Posted on 04/13/2007 at 7:04:00 PM

 
Well-written article. This raises some disturbing questions, and we should all give them some thought.

Posted on 04/13/2007 at 11:04:00 AM

 
Thought provoking piece.

Posted on 04/12/2007 at 2:04:00 PM

 
Interesting article.

Posted on 04/12/2007 at 2:04:00 PM

 
well written - i think it would be an infringement on our rights if we were held to a code of ethics or regulation for blogging - what happened to free speach?

Posted on 04/12/2007 at 6:04:00 AM

 
Two things: we have a choice between adhering to some sort of structure or dealing with the virtual anarchy we have right now. I choose structure. Second, all our freedoms are not designed in a vacuum. Instead, we were intended to exercise maturity and take responsibility for our actions. Anonymous hate commenters do neither. It will not prevent them from speaking if they are required to tell the site owner who they are; it will only force them to take responsibility for their immature and harmful behavior. Remember, your freedom to swing your fist ends at my nose. The bloggers have every right to defend themselves and their freedoms in this manner. You want to say nasty things, say it on your own blog. Nothing keeps these folks from doing that. BTW -- some of the most misogynistic, racist, violent comments are aimed at conservative bloggers like Michelle Malkin -- and it's not just comments. Some have posted addresses and urged violence on them. It's bad out there.

Posted on 04/12/2007 at 3:04:00 AM

 
Well written.

Posted on 04/11/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

 
I believe there should not be a code of conduct for bloggers. Blogging is away for many to express their feelings. If there was a code of conduct or censorship, this would be an infringement on the first amendment rights. Excellent reporting!

Posted on 04/11/2007 at 7:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
Most Commented On