The Methods Used in Adbusters Are Wrong

Brian Jackson
Brian Jackson
  • Published Content: 13
  • Total Views: 23,140
  • Favorited By: 3 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites
The magazine Adbusters is quite difficult to classify. While being informative, it is still quite visceral. The many images put in the magazine by the editors are meant to dismay, scare and anger the reader. Stories in the magazine are designed to do the same thing, and fit in perfectly with the
pictures. The editors did not do this on accident, as no advertisement is entirely by accident. Adbusters is just glorified propaganda.

The ideas put forth in Adbusters are sound and could even be condoned. Their overall message is a justified one, and they are trying to "fight the good fight." However, their methods are absolutely detestable. The images in the magazine, as said previously, are only there for their shock value and very few actually help to inform the reader. Epictetus said that "only the educated are free." So would not the publishers of Adbusters want to inform the reader before they bring ethics and emotion into the picture? The Adbusters website, adbusters.org, says "Our aim is to topple existing power structures and forge a major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century." It sounds like they want to free people from the powers that be, so to free these people, would not they want to first educate them? An example of this horrid display of dirty journalism can be found right in the magazine itself. In the September/October issue, there is an article called "The Moral Rightness of the War," written by Jenny Uechi. The article is accompanied by an image of a bloody soldier. This image is unnecessary because it does not have any context. This soldier could be from any war, and from any time. This image does not inform the reader of anything because it offers no information, just shock. Thus, Adbusters is only using its magazine to spread their own message, and the definition of propaganda is information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc (dictionary.com). This use of propaganda wouldn't be so detestable if they would just come out and say it, but instead they act like they are saviors of the citizens of the world.

 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
"Adbusters" means just that- busting up the culture of advertisement, which numb intellectual curiosity and then molds humans' minds into willingly joining the cult of consumerism. Our culture teaches us that reality should consist of only two states- consuming, or dreaming of consuming. Adbusters says humans are more than that, much more.

Posted on 04/23/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

Adverts pervade our every waking moment, polluting our mental environment and stealing our time away from us, time our brain could be using to come up with revolutionary ideas or being curious about how our actions affect others, and where those actions originate from. Adbusters has an idealistic noble goal to reinvigorate an apathetic society, by pointing out how abnormal it is that we humans lack desire to be more than just idle zombies wasting away in front of the idiot box. But it's not our fault, it's corporations creating our culture for us, with dangerous consequences.

Posted on 04/23/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

Adbusters is a fine culture-jamming periodical that pulls zero punches and has very stunning art and photography designed to stimulate and provoke. All it aims to do deprogram minds jellied by adverts. It points out how instead of thinking our own thoughts, we're being distracted by a constant bombardment of outside influences that are coming from all directions, from adverts on eggshells to adverts on toilet tissue and emergency exits. The news is basically all adverts.

Posted on 04/23/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC