Michelle Malkin on the O'Reilly Factor

By Don Lee, published Apr 16, 2007
Published Content: 90  Total Views: 39,702  Favorited By: 9 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.2 of 5
Michelle Malkin, noted conservative columnist, speaker and author was the guest host on the O'Reilly factor April 12, 2007. She did a fine job of hosting and was interviewing a man named Shabazz who crossed every racial line there is. She asked him if he would apologize to the three white Duke Lacrosse players who have now been found innocent of rape charges launched a year ago by a black stripper, since he was one of those calling for the most severe punishment the law allowed. He had been among those who considered the charges to be a conviction (without benefit of court or evidence.) Shabazz refused flatly to say he was sorry and tried to tell her it was a matter of race and he was defending all the black women who have been raped by white men. She pointed out that it wasn't the case. Three innocent men have been severely damaged by false charges simply because their skin was white and the accuser was black.

I was horrified when he called her a whore! He said she was nothing but a whore for subbing for Bill O'Reilly (a white racist, of all things) and repeated the insult more than once. Michelle Malkin is a respected journalist and didn't deserve such a verbal assault.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
 
We miss Michelle Malkin on TV with Bill O'Reilly.

Posted on 05/03/2008 at 2:05:24 AM

 
Why can't people act like adults when appearing on these talk shows? His behavior did more harm than good for his "cause." (I think he's only in it for himself, and not to "defend" anyone!)

Posted on 07/27/2007 at 11:07:00 AM

 
Don, I recently wrote about Shabazz in an article called 'Free Speech'. I had forgotten all about this one. He tried to come to Toronto recently to spew more venom, but lucky for us they didn't let the jerk into the country. His little gang of believers tried to make a big deal out of it though. From what I read, there were almost more reporters embarrassed to have to be there) than there supporters of this fool.

Posted on 05/18/2007 at 10:05:00 AM

 
Honestly, Jamie, I don't know what price he should have to pay for his bad behavior. He may lose some guest appearances with reasonable talk show producers. But unless she wants to sue him for slander or liable, he'll probably be allowed to keep running his face, unchecked. Manda, if you can think of something we can do, I'll be glad to try. Youranter, if those girls were "scarred for life" by one stupid remark, they need to be kept in a glass case!

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 6:04:00 PM

 
BTW, being devil's advocate: what price should Shabazz pay? He has no nationally-broadcast television or radio show to lose. I don't know what could be done to him.

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 1:04:00 AM

 
I saw that one -- and I'm proud to say Michelle held her end of this shouting match. But -- unfortunately, Shabazz is the tip of the iceberg. These guys are underground all over the place, and it's far from the first time I ever heard of Shabazz. I'd put money it's far from the last time as well. I think we may be entering a new phase of racial troubles, much as I hate to say that.

Posted on 04/18/2007 at 1:04:00 AM

 
That is NOT right!!! What's up with that? Seems like a double standard to me Don, something should definitely be done.

Posted on 04/17/2007 at 9:04:00 PM

 
I'm with you on this, Don. Shabazz and his ilk get away with murder. Add the 'Rev's Sharpton and Jackson to the crew. They can call anyone anything and get away with it. A white guy has to lose his job at least. What Imus said was wrong, but for these girls now to say they're scarred for life? Give me a break.

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 12:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
Most Commented On