How Does the Phrase 'Under God' Live on in Patriotic Rhetoric?

Sgaringer
Sgaringer
  • Published Content: 18
  • Total Views: 3,445
  • Favorited By: 2 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Life in modern American society is complex, challenging, and constantly changing. We're all chasing the elusive American Dream, trying to find a sense of self in a culture of conformity, and searching for someone to connect with and share the chaos. Our government and Constitution are fundamental fo
undations in which society can anchor its morals, identify its principles, and protect citizens' rights. Therefore, it is important that the government not only upholds the Constitution, but also that it abstains from favoring any group within those who are governed. Our nation's Pledge of Allegiance belies this commitment to impartiality by including "Under God", and it needs to be amended. The Pledge of Allegiance should omit the phrase "Under God" in order to embrace all of the faiths or lack thereof that compose the melting pot that we all call home: America.

"When the government puts its imprimatur on a particular religion it conveys a message of exclusion to all those who do not adhere to the favored beliefs. A government cannot be premised on the belief that all persons are created equal when it asserts that God prefers some" (Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Lee v. Weisman). The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, guarantees that individuals will have freedom of religious expression. The government and its agencies will not recognize any one religious faith as more valid than any other faith or secularism, and the government and its agencies will not promote religion above non-religion. As individualism wars with conventionality, it is imperative that our government strives to be unbiased in public discourse and rulings in regards to religion so that all Americans can feel united rather than judged.

 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
"do something positive; get a job, volunteer, go outside." was the end of that sentence.

Posted on 05/08/2007 at 10:05:00 PM

Our identity as established by the forefathers was non-religious; why wouldn't they have mentioned God, or specified for the emphasis on religion in the Constitution? Several of the most influential forefathers were not Christian to begin with. I do agree however that they didn't envision what we have today; which is a country in which the death of celebrities trump news coverage over more important issues. I don't think I need to point out the public examples of people who publicly represent, and preached "Religious Dogma" who have been exposed as morally corrupt. I think everyone in the country should stand for making their own lives better, and helping others do the same for themselves. I stand by what I said in this piece, and don't fall for the idea that re-including "under God" in the pledge; or reintroducing religion into public schools would change future generations. For that, kids need to turn off the television, unplug themselves from electronics, and do something posi

Posted on 05/08/2007 at 6:05:00 PM

Not only are you disillusioned, you are running a circular argument. You are searching for unity in individualism when the two cannot co-exist. You also have absolutely no understanding in what our fore-fathers envisioned for this country. It certainly isn't what is going on today. Following your suggestions would lead our country to anarchy and division. We have an identity and you want to obliterate it. bulldozing the rights of the majority at the bequest of the minorities is not democracy, and it is in no way how our country is supposed to work.

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 1:04:00 AM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC