New Study Proves Abstinence Only Education is Failing

A new study that had been ordered by Congress finds that students who had attended sexual abstinence classes are just as likely to have sex than those who did not attend such classes.

The study shows, furthermore, that the students who attended one out of the four abstinence classes that were reviewed did not have less sexual partners on average, either. The median age for first sexual encounter remained at 14.9 years, as reported by Mathematica Policy Research
New Study Proves Abstinence Only Education is Failing
 Inc.

For the study, students were reviewed from four abstinence programs, as well as students from the same communities who had not participated in the classes as a control group. Students from both large cities such as Milwaukee and Miami were reviewed as well as from rural areas including Powhatan, Virginia, and Clarksdale, Mississippi. This study began when the children were between eleven and twelve years of age in the year of 1999. They were in the program for one to three years. The follow up survey to conclude results was taken in late 2005 and early 2006. The students were now an average of 16.5 years of age. Half of the students who had been enrolled in the classes had remained abstinent. However, so did half of the students from the control group.

Currently, the government spends a whopping $176 million per year on the abstinence classes. This summer, the block grant program known as Title V is up for renewal through congress. The government, on the federal level, has authorized an annual expenditure of $50 million on the program, and then the individual states kick in additional money, to the tune of $3 for every $4. Eight states have rejected and refuse participation in sexual abstinence only programs.

Supporters of the programs argue that they haven't had adequate time for their efforts to be effective. Harry Wilson, the commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the Administration for Children and Families says "This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You can't expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective all throughout the youth's high school career."

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 7 of 7  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

This comes as no surprise to any of us who work with teens. Jesus may heal, but he doesn't prevent procreation or human sexual experience. Sublimated though it may be for some - it doesn't disappear. Naivete is the bitter enemy of progress.

Posted on 06/12/2008 at 5:06:49 PM

you're right jack. it's far too simplistic.

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

Before they teach abstinence in the classroom, they have to prevent students from having sex IN the classroom. Of course, "don't have sex" is way too simplistic in this day and age. Great article, Jennifer.

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

Now, don't get defensive, just enjoy a little laugh.

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 9:04:00 PM

I never said we couldn't. We just usually don't!

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 8:04:00 PM

Comprehensive education is certainly key - see, we CAN agree on something, Leena! :)

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 5:04:00 PM

I agree with that guy...one lousy "don't have sex" speech isn't what keeps teens from having sex. It starts at home but the schools really should teach VERY comprehensively, not just "be safer" or "don't have sex."

Posted on 04/16/2007 at 4:04:00 PM

Comments 1 - 7 of 7