The Top 10 Myths About the Virginia Tech Massacre

Don't Compound the Tragedy

By Brant McLaughlin, published Apr 26, 2007
Published Content: 794  Total Views: 202,153  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Rating: 3.2 of 5
We all know that on April 16th, 2007, a new Day That Shall Live in Infamy was tragically born when a 23-year-old South Korean man who had lived in the US since he was eight and was attending a good American university in the state of Virginia shot to death 32 students and faculty before committing suicide. 33 senseless deaths by guns--the worst non-gang related gun incident in modern American history, and a chilling encore to the Columbine High School massacre of 1999 which claimed 13 lives.

Needless to say there have been some very strong reactions among the American citizenry, not to mention the South Koreans who feel a collective sense of guilt (needlessly). The expected calls for stricter regulations and the finger-pointing emerged immediately while relatives, friends, and fellow students grieved for their lost ones.

But who is offering real solutions? Are most people thinking rationally, considering the facts, at this stage? There are 10 myths emerging regarding the Virginia Tech Massacre that need to be closely analyzed, with facts considered, before we end up compounding the tragedy.

Myth #1. Tighter gun control laws would have prevented that massacre.

It happens all the time: someone does something wrong with something and people want the something taken away...from everybody. Does it work for the betterment of society? No.

Consider what we found at Rapid Intelligence's Factbites. "Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated....That places total victims who lost their lives because of gun control at approximately 56 million in the last century." "Gun-control laws have noticeably reduced gun ownership in some states, with the result that for each 1% reduction in gun ownership there was a 3% increase in violent crime...with no academic evidence that gun regulations prevent crime, and plenty of indications that they actually encourage it, we nonetheless are now debating which new gun control laws to pass."

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
On the other hand, Urijah, if the US does belong at #24, then it's an error of omission on one of our statistician's parts! Additionally, it would still look like it indicates that the US needs more law enforcement officers. With a nation of our size and our love of liberty, I think it would be wise for us to at least be in the Top 10. Would you agree?

Posted on 04/30/2007 at 12:04:00 PM

 
Also--I do apoligize as I have seen that Associated Content's publishing program screwed up some of my original links.

Posted on 04/30/2007 at 12:04:00 PM

 
To Urijah--I don't know what your first comment refers to. As for your second comment, data from 1991 is not relevant to 2007. The data that are shown are the most up to date that NationMaster has available. Don't you find it just a tad bit senseless to think that there would be police per capita statistics on all those other nations, but not on the United States? No, the statistics show that the US has relatively few policeman per capita. In fact, there was a call in the mid-1990s for the US to hire more police officers and spend more money on law enforcement.

Posted on 04/30/2007 at 11:04:00 AM

 
To the "dot"--I never looked up any myths anywhere else, buddy. I gleaned the myths from what the community has been saying. Furthermore, the person lacking thought here is clearly your cowardly self. Get a life and use your brain.

Posted on 04/30/2007 at 11:04:00 AM

 
Actually, looking at Nationmaster's Source "Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems", http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/seventh_survey/7sc.pdf page 476 they have it at 2.43, but the eighth report http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/eighthsurvey/8pc.pdf has it at 3.26 for 2002, while the ninth survey doesn't have that information up yet. Looking at http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/eighthsurvey/5678svr.pdf gives the historical data, (page 4) which shows great year to year changes, which makes me suspect the accuracy. Still, the US is probably in the top twenty or thirty. (And what's up with Kuwait?)

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 10:04:00 AM

 
I believe there is a mistake in Myth 5 "The United States is not even placed among the top 48 nations of the world in terms of police per capita." NationMaster does not have those statistics for the US, that's why it's not listed. Looking at the comments on the page, (bottom) one person has a source that puts it at 2.66 (24th place)and I found some data from 1991 (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-toughcrime.htm) that puts it at 2.18.

Posted on 04/26/2007 at 10:04:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On