The Absurd Superstition of the Paranormal

Belief in the "paranormal" or "supernatural" is a confusion which any competent fiction reader somehow avoids. The man grounded in reality might read a Harry Potter book and understand that the magic and the storyline in it are fantasies, whereas the analysis
 of human nature is a facet that J. K. Rowling at least intends to have application to our lives. The believer in the "paranormal" might, on the contrary, think that the magic and storyline in the books are real, whereas the ideas are a fantasy.

There is nothing wrong with liking a good ghost story, or even an interesting work of fiction about Elvis coming back from the dead. However, the mark of the rational man is the ability to see the conspicuously clear line between truth and fantasy, whereas the believer in the "paranormal" lacks this insight. Why is it that the vast majority of even intellectually mediocre individuals can quite unambiguously note whether or not a given belief is at least feasible via the real methods to knowledge (elementary sensory observation, philosophy, praxeology, mathematics, and the hard sciences), and, when referred to ideas such as UFOs, communication with the dead, ghosts, fairies, or unicorns, instantly dismiss them as not only fictitious, but fictitious without doubt? And why is it that others, all lack of evidence to the contrary notwithstanding, continue to believe these fictions?

Related information
Occam's Razor instructs us to use the simplest explanation compatible with all the evidence.
 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Believers in the paranormal--believe in the paranormal. You portray 'them' as some bizarre psychotic subset of the population--delusional adolescents who cannot appreciate a work of fiction as such, or desperately reach for easy answers to placate themselves. The truth is, the majority of the population 'believes' in ghosts and UFOs, and a large percentage of those people (and even many non-believers) have had first hand paranormal experiences. You really have no insight or facts to back up any point you make.

Posted on 07/20/2007 at 6:07:00 PM

Ms. Richford, thank you for your readership and comments. While the existence of frauds and honestly mistaken individuals does not in itself disprove the supernatural, it does give us ample reasons to be skeptical when someone makes claims regarding it. I think that, when we hear such claims advanced, we need to refrain from accepting them *unless* we have examined every possible rational explanation and still cannot find a way to explain the occurrence. Even then we should not assume the presence of the supernatural, but rather that we simply do not know what happened and do not have sufficient information to give a rational interpretation. Much of what is today taken to be "supernatural" might be explained by evidence and rational insights that will only become available in the future.

Posted on 07/07/2007 at 9:07:00 PM

You make some good points, especially about the fact that people tend to remember the details of "feelings" and "knowings" when they do prove to be "true" and forget the details when nothing confirms them. Does the fact that there are many "fakes" out there claiming to have supernatural powers prove that no one does?

Posted on 07/06/2007 at 4:07:00 AM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3