How I Passed a Lie Detector Test

Lie Detector Tests Are Unreliable

By Wes Laurie, published May 08, 2007
Published Content: 460  Total Views: 468,175  Favorited By: 64 CPs
Rating: 2.6 of 5
In the pursuit of truth and justice law enforcement has often turned to the polygraph or lie detector test to see whether or not an individual is being honest. How one performs upon the lie detector can weigh heavily on the persons reputation as a suspect. What follows is my personal experience having taken a lie detector test, how I beat it, and why I do not believe in them as reliable tools.

I am not going to give you technological definitions or a history on the different lie detecting machines and methods, nor relate any other instances in which people have claimed lie detectors worked or failed. Instead let me start right off with: the crime. I was working as a manager in a fast food restaurant in which we were understaffed and stressed to the limit. Adding to our troubles was the fact that the money counts involving the safe were bouncing here and there and everywhere worse than a Gummy Bear on Meth. Between myself and the other managers the daily total for what was kept in the safe and cash drawers kept dropping, then rising, but then ultimately dropping again. Common sense told me that someone was pocketing some cash, and due to experience with past instances I knew at least one member of the staff had it in their mind they could borrow money as long as they repaid it. Finally weary of the financial inaccuracies I made a call to my district manager to let her know my suspicions and details of the record keeping situation. She told me that she would stop in for a visit the following day, which was my day off. I had done my part to help solve the matter and spent that evening running business as usual and closing the store, therefore I was the last one to slide a deposit envelope into the safe.

How I Passed a Lie Detector Test

Polygraph

Credit: Unknown

Copyright: Unknown

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 30
Next >>
 
Wow, glad I read it, but hope I never need it!! Great title, made me click on it!

Posted on 05/29/2007 at 11:05:00 PM

 
wow...........i've heard of people doing that but i've never seen them publish it...........

Posted on 05/29/2007 at 10:05:00 AM

 
Very interesting. I've never trusted thses things anyway.

Posted on 05/19/2007 at 1:05:00 AM

 
Can be done, did it with the dials and needles old school one years ago

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
I think the detector would work better if the questions were less non-sensical than the ones that were asked of you. You knew you were in the right, even though the details were confused; that's why you passed it, because your conscience was clean even though the particulars were all messed up. I think your situation just shows that the lie detector cannot be used to sort out faulty invesigations. Interesting story.

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

 
I found it intriguing. I think I was under the impression that lie detector tests are generally reliable and that you'd have to be really good (maybe a genius) to fake one. Thanks for the story.

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

 
That was interesting. I'd probably fail. Just being accused of something would make me feel guilty.

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 4:05:00 AM

 
Intresting article.

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 2:05:00 AM

 
Yeah lie detectors are extremely unreliable. You can beat it by doing exactly what you did. Also, if someone is being charged with say murder or something and they are innocent, and you use a lie detector on them, it's usually going to appear that they are lying because what the detectore actually measures is how nervous you are. Your body naturally gets physically nervous when you tell a lie. Pathological liars don't experience that and some say that they are the only ones able to pass a lie detector test... Some people actually still believe that. It's dumb. I hope your article can change some people's minds. Great job :)

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 2:05:00 AM

 
I think that most states don't allow lie detector results to be used as evidence in court because of their unreliability. They most certainly aren't foolproof. I've heard all sorts of things from power of suggesstion (believing something is true) to use of valium and xanex to beat the tests. Great Article!

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 10:05:00 PM

 
Hi again, Wes. I'm not saying they didn't use a real machine or real protocol, quite the opposite. I'm saying it is possible that they employed the same techniques used in employment screenings. They start with an agenda and suspect (in the case of an employee--an issue--usually involving stealing money from work) and go about all the protocol, hoping to 'scare' someone into a confession, or even going to the point of telling the suspect they have 'inconclusive' result, or they outright lie about the results. I believe it is actually legal to lie about the results. I'm not saying this is what happened, just that not only are the actual results of the tests dubious, the use or misuse of them is also.

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
I always heard that the number one tip for passingg a lie detector test is, as you mentioned, to allude yourself into thinking that what you need to believe in order to pass should be mentally conveyed as the truth. Interesting to know that it could actually be done.

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
Great article! Last I knew, the CIA still uses lie detector tests when screening potential workers--but I believe they are used more to intimidate than anythig else. I don't feel results from lie detectors should be allowed as evidence in a court of law

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 6:05:00 PM

 
interesting article...lie detectors are notoriously unreliable.

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

 
Excellent article. I always wanted to see if I could fool one of those machines.

Posted on 05/14/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 30
Next >>
Most Commented On