Gardasil Not the Dream Vaccination Women Expected

For many women in Gardasil vaccination was the answer to their prayers. Women and young girls whose family had a history of Cervical Cancer could now help to prevent contraction of the disease by using the vaccination offered by Merck and Company. But,
Gardasil Not the Dream Vaccination Women Expected
 new evidence is diminishing the hopes that the drug will become mandatory.

Gardasil has been front page news all over the world, promising a nearly 100% efficacy rate in the prevention of 2 strains of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) that causes cervical cancer. Women all over the world were led to believe by the support of The Centers for Disease control and the American Cancer Society that the vaccine would indefinitely prevent the contraction of the virus, but new evidence is reporting the contrary.

According to Dr. George Sawaya of the University of California San Francisco the effects of the vaccine are "modest" at best. "The effect is fairly small, "said Sawaya. "The recommendation for widespread vaccination of women after they become sexually active may need to be rethought." This belief stems from the evidence that the vaccination only reducing the incidence of cancer precursors by a mere 17%.

W. Martin Kast, an immunologist for the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine also believes the original outcome from the studies may have been tainted. He says the study did not go on for a long enough time to reveal the vaccines true worth or potential.

With at least 24 state legislatures introducing bills to mandate the vaccination, this new "insufficient evidence" of efficacy may lead to bill reform and blockage. The bills are also being affected by the high cost of the vaccination. Costing around $360 for three shots plus the cost of the doctor's visits, the vaccination is one of the most pricy available to young women today.

Women rightfully want the vaccination to have real and lasting effects. More than 3,900 women die each year in the United States from cervical cancer where Pap screening is relatively inexpensive. But, in the rest of the world where Pap screening is far too expensive to be widespread, more than 250,000 women are killed each year.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 8 of 8  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I think you people are idiots! Why would you not protect the young women of america? My daughter has recieved the vaccine, because if I can reduce the chances of her getting any of the strains of HPV, especially those that can cause cervical cancer, then I'm doing it. I don't care what the chances are of her getting cervical cancer, but I've known way to many women who have had it. My daughters life means to much for me to sit on some high horse! There are also some more studies that show the vaccine to be even more effective than previously thought.

Posted on 10/07/2007 at 3:10:00 AM

Not surprising. The risk of cervical cancer even for unvaccinated women is less than 1%, yet the government wants everyone to get hysterical and act like the risk of dying of cervical cancer is as common as getting killed in a car accident. It's amazing what is done in the name of profit.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

My daughter will get this vaccine over my dead body. I felt this way before and I this just reinforces my feelings. Great article.

Posted on 05/15/2007 at 9:05:00 PM

very interesting, especially considering the marketing blitz surrounding this vaccine. good reporting!

Posted on 05/12/2007 at 3:05:00 AM

Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say most vaccines have limited effectiveness, but it is good that the efficacy of this vaccine was brought to light. Thanks for the article!

Posted on 05/10/2007 at 11:05:00 PM

I'm glad that this study was done, and more like it should have been done before the vaccine went onto the market. The truth is most vaccines have limited effectiveness. They are a waste of time and money.

Posted on 05/10/2007 at 10:05:00 PM

In Texas, Governor Perry tried to ram this vaccine down the throats of parents this year. He wanted it to be another vaccine that girls were required to get before entering 6th grade. I, among many other parents, was livid. Then it became clear that Merck had lobbied heavily for the governor to make that requirement. Who knows how much money changed hands in that deal. Fortunately, our legislature overturned that requirement.

Posted on 05/10/2007 at 3:05:00 PM

I don't think any vaccine should be "mandatory" - it should only be at the discretion of the consumer or patient

Posted on 05/10/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

Comments 1 - 8 of 8