Should Churches Be Tax Exempt?

And Why Should They Be Tax Exempt?

By Andre Smith Jr, published May 16, 2007
Published Content: 12  Total Views: 3,370  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 3.8 of 5
This question goes to the very foundation of the US Constitution, namely the first amendment and the clause of separation between church and state. Frankly, is giving any religious institution the ability of being tax exempt a violation of this separation?

In such effect I believe that it does violate the Constitution of the United States.

"A more certain way to attack religion is by favor, by the comforts of life, by the hope of wealth; not by what reminds one of it, but by what makes one forget it; not by what makes one indignant, but by what makes men lukewarm, when other passions act on our souls, and those which religion inspires are silent. In the matter of changing religion, State favors are stronger than penalties". -- The Spirit of the Laws, Baron de Montesquieu (1748)

Indeed by allowing such favors as tax exempt status is indeed a favor from the state (federal government), you get problems especially when you legally are supposed to be a nation of secularism. Now there is a difference between acting in a governmental capacity one must administer laws and policies in a secular fashion. However, when you are in your private home, in the street, and in your thoughts you have the freedom to exercise and not to exercise any religion or no religion you the individual so choose.

Such tax exemptions status must be available to all groups. The only restriction on how the legislatures act when it comes to creating and giving out tax exemptions is that they are not permitted to do so based upon preferences for content or based upon a group's failure to take certain oaths. In other words, once tax exemptions are created at all, the process for allowing certain groups to take advantage of them is restricted by constitutional rights.

In particular, they cannot give exemptions to a group merely because the group is religious, and they cannot take away exemptions for the same reason. If tax exemptions are created for magazines or books or whatever, the exemptions must be available to all parties, not just religious and not just secular applicants.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
very interesting article with some points to think about. Thanks

Posted on 06/04/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

 
Interesting. You made some points that I'd personnaly never thought about before.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 9:05:00 AM

 
As a secular humanist, I do not feel it is right for me to subsidize any faith of any kind regardless of popularity in this nation as a whole, or if it is just that one person. People want their faith to have a church, they can pull it out of their own pocket I'd like my $1000 bucks back each year.

Posted on 05/20/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
As a Christian, I believe that the separation of church and state is a Biblical doctrine and that churches with tax-exempt status are unequally yoking themselves. I don't think that paying taxes would make churches more regulated--in fact, I think the tax-exempt status makes for more regulations. After all, churches have to meet certain criteria in order to qualify for tax-exemptions. In order to keep this status, they have to walk the line the Government has drawn. So, who are these tax-exempt churches really serving...God or the Govt? Look around at the current state of the "church" today and I think the answer is clear.

Posted on 05/18/2007 at 6:05:00 AM

 
I feel the tax exemptions for the church are very important to keep in place.

Posted on 05/17/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On