Find » Opinion/Editorial » America Should Eliminate Partisan P...

America Should Eliminate Partisan Politics

We Deserve More Than Two Choices

By Sundance McGee, published May 16, 2007
Published Content: 52  Total Views: 63,843  Favorited By: 28 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.8 of 5
People who know me might say I have a difficult time admitting I don't know the answer. And they'd be right. I've been known to argue with Alex Trebek while watching Jeopardy. I stubbornly refuse to ask for directions when it's clear to everyone but me I'm lost. I've even argued with a person who tried to point out to me that I gave them too much change in a financial transaction. I don't like being wrong and I have a difficult time saying, "I don't know," when someone asks a question.

That's why it's not easy for me to tell the readers of this article, that I just don't understand politics. Oh, I'll be the first person to criticize politicians from any level of government if I think they're doing something stupid, unethical, illegal or just wrong for their constituents, but perhaps my criticism is based on ignorance.

Having spent most of my adult life in an apathetic fog of denial with regard to politics, my ignorance may be justified. Unfortunately, apathy is not synonymous with being brain-dead. I still perused the newspapers, watched the talking heads on the news and paid attention to what was happening in the world around me. Furthermore, I've spent the last four or five years studying to learn the system that legislates our actions, governs our country and represents America to the rest of the world. Without knowledge, how could I possibly criticize and take steps to correct what doesn't seem right with the political process?

The more I learn, the more confused I become by politics. First of all, politicians disgust, insult and embarrass me! They say what the voter wants to hear to get elected, and then immediately start doing whatever they need to in order to gain power, influence and money. Although my optimistic nature forces me to believe there are a few that are in it for the good of the people, recent events seem to indicate differently.

America Should Eliminate Partisan Politics

My America would have only Red, White & Blue States.

Credit: Ron DeYoung

Copyright: Ron DeYoung

Takeaways
  • Political partisanship stifles individuality and prevents unique ideas from being heard or considerd
  • Are we not one nation under God, with liberty and justice for all?
  • Why can't there be a political party just for people like me?
Did You Know?
Support UCSEPPBSEMWLPEAWWIUPGHIUT, my proposed political party.
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 15
 
 
The founding fathers (well, the ones I like) had the idea that there would be multiple factions within a two party system so that (to use mdn examples) the Democrats and Republicans would be composed of people who sometimes voted with each other and sometimes didn't. This would, in the ff's opinion, prevent a lock-jaw, two party system. Our party system now demands allegiance, which needs to be eliminated. But who will do it? I think it's impossible unless we get around to a popular Dem/Rep. defecting and running a (honest) independent campaign. Grassroots is wonderful, but only follows political change, doesn't make it. BTW, what's this "disclaimer" from AC? Perhaps that can be yr next article?!

Posted on 11/13/2007 at 9:11:00 AM

 
Excellent points. America has become more of a dictation than a land of the free in some ways. This was written very well. :-)

Posted on 07/11/2007 at 10:07:00 PM

 
this is excellent! I am so sick of the division that this country has become. UNITED States has become such an overstatement and that's ashame

Posted on 06/18/2007 at 9:06:00 PM

 
I miss the days when, after elected, politicians put their party affiliation behind them for the next 3 1/2 years and worked TOGETHER to get things done. That won't happen anymore with all the special interest groups taking over Washington. Speaking of which...I don't get why people think Reagan was a good president. If not for him messing with the FCC we would not have the likes of Rush Limbaugh on the airways courtesy of special interest money.

Posted on 05/29/2007 at 1:05:00 AM

 
Hmmm..they must have removed the disclaimer. I think I know why it was put there; this is one of the reasons I no longer submit to AC. Outstanding article, Sundance. Sign me up for your political party! I feel the same way.

Posted on 05/26/2007 at 10:05:00 AM

 
Shorten the name and I'll join up! This is one of the most balanced pieces of writing on the subject that I've read.

Posted on 05/22/2007 at 12:05:00 PM

 
Thank you all for your comments and support. I truly do try to understand AC's motivation for the things they do and am quite often left with a blank. I have been told by enough people who I respect that I'm a helluva writer, and sometimes I think AC treats the CP's that can form a sentence with less consideration than those that poorly reword someone elses work about the celebrity of the moment. I think the concept of AC is great, but things like this would make people question their credibility. I'm glad I'm not alone in thinking this is wrong.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
Great article. Stupid disclaimer.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
Mwa ha ha @ LUCSEPPBSEMWLPEAWWIUPGHIUT. This article was great and doesn't deserve the disclaimer as you had some very valid points that aren't at all humorous. The majority of the founding fathers were against political parties as they felt that they impeded progress. Sign me up for the new party though the name ARP might catch on better.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

 
Great article. To nitpick, the words "under god" in our pledge don't date back to the 18th Century. They were inserted in 1954, partly because of the atheistic red scare. And personally, my biggest problem with Reagan (other than Iran Contra, and sleeping during cabinet meetings, etc) was that he was the biggest union busting President we've ever had. And I know unions can become out of control sometimes, but without them the average worker wouldn't have half of what they deserve. Your article doesn't deserve the 'humor' disclaimer. I'm puzzled by it.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 6:05:00 PM

 
Good article Sundance. I'd always been a Democrat in the past, but I consider myself neutral now.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

 
You'll have to shorten the LUCSEPPBSEMWLPEAWWIUPGHIUT Party. My ADD got me distracted half way through it. But, I agree with you 100%. You get a five on the yeah scale. I could actually feel your anger, irritation, and frustration as you wrote it.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

 
You're right about the disclaimer, and great article!

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

 
Excellent article, Sundance :) Yes, I get it.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
According to the guy who wrote this, and contrary to the editorial disclaimer preceding the article, this was not meant to be "for humor purposes only." It was meant to point out how true democracy is being thwarted by a two party political system that fosters corruption and illegal, unethical practices. The author doesn't think that's humorous.

Posted on 05/16/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 15
 
Advertisment