Grass Roots Lobbying in Danger of Becoming Illegal

By E. Hignutt, published May 17, 2007
Published Content: 71  Total Views: 26,718  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
Remember the novel "1984" by George Orwell? We all know that Big Brother is here. And he's getting ready to take another huge chunk out of American freedoms.

The House Judiciary Committee plans to consider the House lobbying reform bill by the end of May. Two other bills are on the table as possible amendments: H.R. 2093 http://www.hslda.org/elink.asp?id=4097 and H.R. 984 http://www.hslda.org/elink.asp?id=4098 .

These bills have the potential to be reworded to prevent grass roots lobbying. This effects any of the organizations that send emails, letters, or other wise place notices to individuals encouraging them to contact their congressmen either for or against a particular bill. Organizations such as the ASPCA, NRA, HSLDA, and thousands of others could be affected by this bill.

H.R. 2093, a bill to "Amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995," will control attempts to urge citizens to contact their elected representatives by broadening the definition of a "lobbying firm" to include entities that spend, receive or agree to spend or receive $100,000 per quarter on such lobbying activities. Such groups send "alert" emails when upcoming bills may change the laws against the various things the groups were formed to protect. The groups range from homeschool organizations, to animal protection rights groups, gun ownership associations, and many more.

H.R. 984, the "Executive Branch Reform Act of 2007" will require over 9,000 employees in the Executive Branch to report any "significant contact" between the employee and a citizen about any official government action. Obviously, their is much danger in the wording. How can you quantitatively define "significant contact"? Does that mean employees aren't allowed to make casual conversation with their political representatives for fear of having "significant contact"? No casual mention of any upcoming legislation? Does this not impair "Freedom of Speech" as guaranteed by our forefathers back in 1776. Such freedoms were the reasons thousands have died and why we fought to become our own country.

Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On