Find » Society » History » The Harms of Drugs Versus the Harms...

The Harms of Drugs Versus the Harms of the War on Drugs

By G. Stolyarov II, published May 15, 2007
Published Content: 940  Total Views: 275,075  Favorited By: 33 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
I personally find all currently illegal drugs loathsome; they stunt the mind, inhibit the body, and curtail productivity. I would never consume such substances myself, and I would advise others against doing so. Yet, compared to the adverse effects of their illegalization, the harm of drugs themselves is small indeed. Drug-taking is extremely unhealthy for the persons engaging in it, but not for anybody who abstains from it. The "War on Drugs," by contrast, harms everybody subject to a government that undertakes it. I have no sympathy for drug addicts; I wish to argue the case of the innocent, moral, productive people who have never used such substances in their lives but are nonetheless harmed by the coercive illegalization of drugs.

There are ethical problems with drug-taking, but the ethical problems with the War on Drugs far exceed them. Let us presume that someone has decided to ruin his life by consuming harmful drugs. That decision alone would likely deny him the voluntary association of respectable people; these respectable people would thus not be damaged by any adverse consequences to the drug-taker's health, career, and personality. By the very fact of strongly disapproving of drug-consumption on an ethical basis, one shields oneself from the adverse consequences of drug-consumption. This would be the case on a free market; the only damage from drug-taking would come to the drug addict himself-not to respectable others.

Yet this is not the case under a government-waged War on Drugs. The War on Drugs is waged with taxpayer money-which especially means the money of respectable, well-to-do people, who are taxed higher under the perverse "progressive" or punitive tax system. Thus, to regulate and thwart the activities of the addicts, the government expropriates substantial property from moral, productive people who do not even think about consuming illegal drugs. To punish the self-destructive, the government must also punish the self-improving and deprive them of the fruits of and the incentives for their self-improvement.

Did You Know?
The War on Drugs is waged with taxpayer money-which especially means the money of respectable, well-to-do people, who are taxed higher under the perverse "progressive" or punitive tax system.
Comments
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Legalize all of it.

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 11:03:39 AM

 
It amazes me that we did not learn from Prohibition. People drank a great deal and many lives were lost in fighting the alcohol. To this day, beer runs like a river through our society and it seems to be more popular than any other alcohol. The amount of catering to the bottle babies makes me sick, especially when a person with 1/16 of a gram of a white powder is arrested, or you can get arrested for having one marijuana cigarrette( no I don't smoke it) but drunks on the highway kill thousands every year. That is the hypocritical stance of the US government on the issue.

Posted on 11/14/2007 at 10:11:00 AM

 
Our government is hipocritical in its drug policies, and its war on drugs. People are going to use drugs regardless of laws against it. Our "legal" drugs,(i.e. alcohol, and tobacco), kill more people every year than all other illegal drugs combined. Enacting a law on morality is always a doomed cause, because you can't control it; it is up to the individual person whether or not they use drugs. So make them all illegal, or make them legal, you can't have it both ways, because they are always going to be there regardless which way you go.

Posted on 10/16/2007 at 12:10:00 AM

 
what an absolute crock of speculative nonsense, this has to be the least academically written piece I have read in a long time, and therefore if anyone chooses to take your arguments seriously it is clear that they are merely using your incoherent babble as a means to back up their own ill-formed, sensationalistic point of view. Yes, the war on drugs is a ridiculous idea, destined to fail before it began (much like the war in Iraq, but that's a different story), which is why i clicked on your text, but your reasoning behind it is shoddy at best. I bid you adieu

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 5:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Advertisment