The Harms of Drugs Versus the Harms of the War on Drugs
By G. Stolyarov II, published May 15, 2007
Published Content: 940 Total Views: 275,075 Favorited By: 33 CPs
Embed:
I personally find all currently illegal drugs loathsome; they stunt the mind, inhibit the body, and curtail productivity. I would never consume such substances myself, and I would advise others against doing so. Yet, compared to the adverse effects of their illegalization, the harm of drugs themselves is small indeed. Drug-taking is extremely unhealthy for the persons engaging in it, but not for anybody who abstains from it. The "War on Drugs," by contrast, harms everybody subject to a government that undertakes it. I have no sympathy for drug addicts; I wish to argue the case of the innocent, moral, productive people who have never used such substances in their lives but are nonetheless harmed by the coercive illegalization of drugs. There are ethical problems with drug-taking, but the ethical problems with the War on Drugs far exceed them. Let us presume that someone has decided to ruin his life by consuming harmful drugs. That decision alone would likely deny him the voluntary association of respectable people; these respectable people would thus not be damaged by any adverse consequences to the drug-taker's health, career, and personality. By the very fact of strongly disapproving of drug-consumption on an ethical basis, one shields oneself from the adverse consequences of drug-consumption. This would be the case on a free market; the only damage from drug-taking would come to the drug addict himself-not to respectable others.
Yet this is not the case under a government-waged War on Drugs. The War on Drugs is waged with taxpayer money-which especially means the money of respectable, well-to-do people, who are taxed higher under the perverse "progressive" or punitive tax system. Thus, to regulate and thwart the activities of the addicts, the government expropriates substantial property from moral, productive people who do not even think about consuming illegal drugs. To punish the self-destructive, the government must also punish the self-improving and deprive them of the fruits of and the incentives for their self-improvement.

More by G. Stolyarov II
- Social Welfare Functions - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
- Dynamics of Majority Rule and Alternative Voting Mechanisms - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
- Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and Related Ideas - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
- Probability Generating Functions, Poisson Processes, and Assorted Exam-Style Questions
You may also like...
- The Harms of Drugs Versus the Harms of t...
- The War on Drugs Part 1: Monetary Effect...
- The Truth About the War on Drugs; Our Wa...
- Law Enforcement Officers Unite Against "...
- Prohibition and the War on Drugs
- Marijuana Prohibition and the War on Dru...
- The History of the War on Drugs in Ameri...
- Is the American War on Drugs Effective?
- The Cost Effectiveness of the War on Dru...
- The Laws of Supply and Demand and the Wa...
Did You Know?
The War on Drugs is waged with taxpayer money-which especially means the money of respectable, well-to-do people, who are taxed higher under the perverse "progressive" or punitive tax system.Today's Most Commented On
Advertisment

David Whitsell
Add a Comment
Posted on 03/24/2008 at 11:03:39 AM
Charlotte
Add a Comment
Posted on 11/14/2007 at 10:11:00 AM
Steve
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/16/2007 at 12:10:00 AM
Paul
Add a Comment
Posted on 10/10/2007 at 5:10:00 PM