Licensing Naturopaths, Herbalists & Other Alternative Medicine Providers

Should Alternative Medicine Be Regulated Just like Mainstream Medicine?

It's estimated that fewer than 3% of all licensed physicians practice any form of "alternative" medicine but a full 36% of Americans use some form of complimentary medicine on a regular basis, according to a 2004 study done by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative
 Medicine. Factor in non-medical treatments like prayer and nutritional therapies like megavitamin therapy, and that number rises to 62%. Clearly, Americans are embracing "natural" and alternative medicine in record numbers. But who's providing the services?

Inconsistent (and the complete lack of) regulation, which varies widely from state to state, makes it impossible to know how many people are practicing alternative therapies like naturopathy, herbalism and homeopathy on a professional basis. Potentially, there are thousands of minimally-trained practitioners offering medical services to patients who have no idea that their "doctor" is unlicensed and unqualified.

So why is there so much debate about licensing alternative health care providers like naturopaths and herbalists? Opponents of licensing claim that such licensing would deny patients freedom of choice and put self-educated practitioners out of business. But what about the safety of their patients? Licensing will ultimately protect patients from unqualified practitioners. If you're a client of natural or alternative medicine here's what you need to know:

1. Licensing will assure that your practitioner has adequate training. The vast majority of herbalists, homeopaths and naturopaths operating in this country are self-taught and have no clinical experience before they're granted their diplomas. Even worse is the fact that many have never even met their instructors or mentors because they "earned" their diplomas through online diploma mills. Licensing alternative practitioners will assure that your provider has hands-on training and hasn't simply taken a 6-week online "course".

Related information
  • Nearly 2/3 of all Americans use "alternative" therapies on a regular basis.
  • Many practitioners are forced to work in a legal "gray" area without defined legal boundaries.
  • Licensure of alternative practitioners would protect both the client and the provider.
 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I find it very interesting that when a profession seeks recognition it always starts advocating for licensure. When they talk about being a licensed profession they always fail to mention that it is the state or municipal that is the financial benefactor of all licensed professions. The other factor that is not mention is that the training of a licensed profession is regulated by the state or municipal. The question that needs to be asked is how does a state regulated license protected the consumer?

Posted on 05/13/2009 at 9:05:07 PM

Great piece.

Posted on 04/01/2009 at 10:04:35 AM

@ Lynda: Madoff may have been a lot of things but he wasn't so "incompetent" he couldn't fleece a lot of smart folks. ;-)

Posted on 01/12/2009 at 4:01:43 AM

Do you really think that licensing prevents "bad" practioners? There are many licensed "qualified" doctors out there who are totally incompetent. Same goes for attorneys, brokers (Bernard Madoff), mechanics and plumbers.

Posted on 01/11/2009 at 10:01:03 PM

that's a huge differential in percentages between docs that practice any form of alternative med. and americans that use some form of it

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 7:05:00 PM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5