BabyFirstTV - Turning Minds on or Tuning Them Out?

By Lynn Glessner, published May 18, 2007
Published Content: 53  Total Views: 24,974  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
As niche cable channels continue, you may have noticed most satellite customers now have "Babyfirst TV". Babyfirst TV is carried by satellite providers only. It is not yet available on cable.

BabyfirstTV promoters state that it's purpose is "to provide a unique, engaging and educational experience for baby during the first stages of early learning". They define their target audience as age 6 months to 3 years. However, there is no evidence that television is beneficial for babies, and a growing concern that it may be harmful. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no screen time for children under two.

The Coalition for Commercial Free Childhood was, as usual, first on the scene. They filed a complaint against BabyFirstTV with the FTC in 2006. The complaint stated that BabyFirstTV was making false and deceptive marketing claims that its programs are educational for babies and toddlers. That complaint is currently under review.

While the complaint languishes under review, The Coalition for Commercial Free Childhood has published a letter on their website, and sent it to the 10 largest cable companies, urging them not to carry BabyFirstTV.

"BabyFirstTV's false and deceptive advertising undermines babies' wellbeing by exploiting parents' natural tendency to want what's best for their children," said CCFC's co-founder, Dr. Susan Linn. "Cable companies face a critical choice: they can attempt to profit from this exploitation or they can support families by refusing to work with companies that actively deceive parents."

BabyFirstTv defends itself by claiming to be interactive, and involving parents. On their website, they state:
"As BabyFirstTV encourages parents to have an active role, the channel offers unique parents' subtitles for parents to guide them on words and movements to use with baby during the programs - making the experience as educational and engaging as reading a book."

BabyFirstTV - Turning Minds on or Tuning Them Out?

Do we need television for babies?

Credit: Michael Bretherton

Copyright: stock.xchg

Resources
  • CCFC Letter
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I never heard of this and I have to say it does sound like a bad thing.

Posted on 06/01/2007 at 8:06:00 AM

 
Can't be a good thing -- a t.v. babysitter available 24 hours a day. You know a lot of parents will use it as that. I too, have read many studies about how brain synapses end up shorter than they could be when a young child is exposed to media images, especially fast moving images (which most everything is now, think back to how "slow" Mr. Rogers was, it was real time, not sped up, super edited media time). I agree with the CCFC -- it does more harm than good as a general rule, don't view tv/videos as an option except for the occasional treat.

Posted on 05/25/2007 at 6:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On