New Pill Promises No More Periods for Women

On Tuesday, the FDA is expected to announce approval for Lybrel, a new birth control pill from Wyeth. Women have been looking for ways to avoid their period, as indicated by the success of recently-marketed pills that allow women to experience fewer periods each year. Lybrel, however, is
New Pill Promises No More Periods for Women
 the first birth control pill that would be FDA approved to allow a woman to skip her period indefinitely.

The name "Lybrel" is meant to conjure thoughts of "liberty." Other pills, like Yaz and Loestrin promise periods that are shorter in length, while Seasonique (the new version of Seasonale) is intended to reduce the occurrence of periods to 4 times per year. However, recent surveys indicate that up to half of all women say that they would prefer to skip their period altogether, which is the market segment that Wyeth seems to be targeting with Lybrel.

Some experts have raised concerns about the safety and wisdom of interrupting the menstrual cycle for extended periods of time. Paula S. Derry, a health psychologist from Baltimore, says "menstrual suppression itself is unnatural" and says there's not enough long-term safety date to support the practice. However, most doctor's agree that there is no medical reason that a woman needs to have a period and that periods can in fact cause major problems (like anemia) in some women. These doctors also note that women have been tinkering with their periods since birth control pills were developed with no widespread ill-effects.

The major problem with Lybrel seems to be with "breakthrough bleeding," which is bleeding that occurs outside of a woman's period. In one pre-approval study, 59 percent of women taking Lybrel had no bleeding after six months, however, another 18 percent of women dropped out of the study because of spotting and breakthrough bleeding. Some people see this as trading scheduled bleeding for unscheduled bleeding, a tough sell to say the least.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 26 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

For women with PMDD, this could be a very great thing. Another great article!

Posted on 05/26/2007 at 9:05:00 PM

Interesting article. Good job!

Posted on 05/26/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

PJMaxham - Women sure do have periods when they breastfeed!

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

It seems we have published a very similar article! See mine, when it gets published in the next couple of days or so...

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

The only inconvenience I find with my period is that it makes me eat nonstop for a week before... But i just grab my iPod and head to the gym. Some may not like it, but check out my article for some inspiration: "Music Is God: Worship Your Body"

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

Yeah, and I don't like the "inconvienence" of having snot in my nose. Periods are natural, they are supposed to occur, and advancements in technology do not mean that we should mess with natural bodily processes.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 11:05:00 PM

You cant fool mother nature. I look for serious consequences of this pilll like any other birth control down the road.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

Very good topic. Too bad they didn't have these BEFORE I got old. LOL @ Moonbeam - LMAO.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 9:05:00 AM

Great article. I think the FDA continues to show us approval after approval, as well as disapproval afere disapproval, just how bent their judgment is. Wanting and needing are two very different issues. I agree, it will be interesting to see how this all pans out.

Posted on 05/22/2007 at 8:05:00 PM

If you think about it , women probably AREN't meant to have so many periods in there life. For thousands of years, women had children much earlier (no period when your pregnant) They had more children (Birth control is a new invention) and they breast fed there children for about 4 years ( no periods while breast feeding) Probably in the course of a lifetime, ancient women had far fewer periods than we do now. Great article!

Posted on 05/21/2007 at 12:05:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 26 Next >>