Cable vs Satellite: How to Choose

By Kay Reynolds, published Apr 06, 2006
Published Content: 154  Total Views: 397,442  Favorited By: 12 CPs
Rating: 2.9 of 5
For the last several years, television companies have been waging an ongoing war: cable TV versus satellite. Which is better for the consumer? Many customers will swear by one provider or the other, insisting that their choice is the superior one, but since both sides have pros and cons, how does a customer choose?

If you've been struggling with advertisements and websites, trying to decide between cable and satellite, this article will help outline the pros and cons and allow you to choose the right one for your family. The decision really lies in what you like to watch on television, where you live, and how often you watch TV.

EQUIPMENT

Cable service comes with many different packages to choose from. Basic cable requires no extra equipment, though a technician will have to come out and install the connection. If you want to upgrade to the next available option, a cable box and interactive remote is required. The box and remote are lent from your cable provider to you, and must be returned when you cancel your service. Upgrades are usually free of charge.


Satellite requires a dish that is positioned on your roof near the place where your television is located. The dish feeds your channels to your television through a satellite, and is required to receive service. For HD channels (high definition) you will need a second, larger dish to receive premium channels. 

The prices for installation are usually comparable, and since installation is a one-time fee, this should not be your deciding factor. 

Who Wins: Draw


RECEPTION

With cable, you will rarely lose service, unless the entire system is out of order. Typically, cable is lost only for a period of an hour or so, and most providers will deduct time lost from your bill. Satellite, on the other hand, will be fuzzy or nonexistant during a storm because the satellite feed will be garbled by thunder and lightening.


Who Wins: Cable

Takeaways
  • Satellite television is available more universally than cable.
  • Cable television rarely requires a contract.
  • Satellite television requires a dish, while cable needs only a box and remote.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
 
Sorry, didn't realize it would cut me off. What I was saying at the end there was that Lilly you are a moron. Cable does offer contracts in some areas to get better deals and to call someone a liar based on the limited fact of your areas is stupid. Dish doesn't REQUIRE a contract. It is just required if you want the best deals. Many cable operators do the same thing. Check your facts before you call someone a liar.

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 7:12:00 AM

 
This article is clearly skewed in favor of Cable. I would like to know some of the background of this author and his "publisher". First he writes that cable's downtime is far less than Satellite and typically for just an hour. There are several articles (one from Consumer Reports) that report that Cable is down for a day or more 17% of the time compared to Satellite at about 11%. Where he gets this number is ridiculous. Second, I have had Time Warner twice and both times they were rude and indifferent. I have had Comcast. They too were very rude. I know my one case does not make a study but studies do bear out that customers are on average far more satisfied with Satellite. Lastly, he calls the HD signal a draw? It is well known that Cable suffers from compression and conversion issues that are far less of a problem with Satellite. Typically, the signal you get from Cable for HD is not true HD and has far less audio clarity. As for the contract issue. Lilly, you are a moro

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 7:12:00 AM

 
I have had Time-Warner cable since 1/2007, prior to that I had DishNetwork for about 6 years. The cable has been down 5 times more in 9 months than the dish was in 6 years. If DishNetwork had had local channels in high def when I switched to cable, I never would have switched. I am going Direct TV in a couple of days. I think it offers more now than DishNetwork. Cable sucks.

Posted on 10/29/2007 at 10:10:00 AM

 
I did not sign a contract with what I have which is dig Voice .. high speed internet, and cable T.v so far I have had to call out help and I have learned how to get my picture back when it goes out.. and also even though it was frustrating... the techs on the phone and the ones who came out have been very polite and good some know more that others.. but they have also been pretty much ontime.. the charge for the three items I have are more than I care for so may not be able to keep very long.. I am 73 years old and some days I feel anger but hopefully, I won't get that upset!

Posted on 10/13/2007 at 4:10:00 PM

 
I just bought a HD TV and do not have any cable because I do not watch much TV. I just want a Clear picture and receive a signal. I am fine with my local channels only. I bought a 50db Antenna without results. Do I have to have cable to see the picture on the HD TV? I called DirectTV and the want to charge me $14.99 extra for the receivers and $9.00 extra for the HD receiver. Any Advice?

Posted on 09/03/2007 at 9:09:00 PM

 
I called Direct TV asked for a basic package for one TV. The man on the phone said we were not qualified for their ad that said $29.95 but could give me $44.95 a month. I asked him is this a contract and he said no. He said he could upgrade me to a DVR at the same $44.95 price. I agreed and then I got my bill for $58.65 and in small print committement for 24 months. I called and they said I was committed and I said I never signed or committed to 24 months. He said it would be $300.00 to cancel. I box the DVR, sent it, now waitng to dispute if they send me a $300.00 bill. If DirectTv had been honest to me the first time, I might have gone contract, 24mo, $58.00. But do not want to deal with a company who lies to you. I only get TV for my husband who likes sports. So he has to have TV. The rest of the programs are very poor programs and full of commercials. I quit enjoying TV a long time ago. I rent movies once in awhile but lots of them are silly stories. It is a rarity to find a goo

Posted on 08/13/2007 at 6:08:00 PM

 
also, i got tired of my cable bill increasing several times a year. with directv i get more for less and do not have rate increases all the time - directv = win

Posted on 08/08/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
directv is up 99% of the time whereas cable has frequent outages. it is a myth that satellite tv is weather dependent. A good installer will set it up right the first time.

Posted on 08/08/2007 at 2:08:00 PM

 
HAHAHA you're all wrong. I rent videos and I never have image problems hahaha I 've moved up the ladder, now I don't worry about cable or satellite hahaha!

Posted on 07/18/2007 at 2:07:00 PM

 
I believe satellite offers the best picture quality due to all channels being transmitted in digital. Unfortunately, weather does play a role when on satellite and in my area you can lose the signal without it being an earth shaking thunder storm.

Posted on 07/18/2007 at 6:07:00 AM

 
Lily is right Comcast does not have contracts and as far back as i can remember they never did and i've never had a problem with my cable or internet service from comcast or adelphia and i've lived in many different places

Posted on 07/08/2007 at 8:07:00 PM

 
You're lying Chris, Comcast do not have contracts!

Posted on 05/21/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

 
your wrong comcast made me sign a 2 year contract while directv didnt

Posted on 04/29/2007 at 10:04:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 13 of 13
 
Most Commented On