The Destructive Misogyny of Grey's Anatomy

Examining the Distorted View Presented by Season Three of Grey's Anatomy

By Amy Whittle, published May 23, 2007
Published Content: 380  Total Views: 522,969  Favorited By: 7 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
Even if you only casually watch Grey's Anatomy you've probably noticed the changes between seasons one and two and season three. In the post "Burning the House Down" show creator and writer Shonda Rhimes tries to explain her vision of season three of Grey's Anatomy and why viewers should stick around for the fourth.

For those that felt the last episode of season three left some questions to be answered, the insights Shonda provides are a disturbing indication of how far off course Grey's Anatomy has traveled. Once hailed as a girl power show where females cared about their profession as much as their relationships, the third season of Grey's Anatomy was almost unrecognizable.

If the season three of Grey's Anatomy has differed in tone so drastically from other seasons, it is because the main characters have been replaced with female stereotypes. When addressing the character of Cristina, Shonda begins her paragraph with "oh the Cristina of it all". Shonda uses that phrase to describe two other people, using their names to stand in for a group of ideas, not actual characters.

The problem with Grey's Anatomy replacing female characters with sets of poorly conceived stereotypes is apparent in the finale: there is no reason for the characters to be acting this way. There has been no convincing reason put forth by Grey's Anatomy or Shonda as to why Cristina must accommodate Burke by sacrificing herself. Yet it is Cristina's sacrifices that end her marriage to Burke.

In the last episode of season three, Cristina is so helpless that Burke must "set her free". However, no one is exactly why she is so weak. Her character is markedly different from the strong surgical intern of the first two seasons, a fact Shonda has yet to explain.

Even more interesting the character of Chris Marlowe, a former boyfriend whom Cristina did not change for during their relationship. So similar in position to Burke, one wonders why Cristina did not alter her character for this man if she is so helpless in relationships. Instead, Cristina blindly follows Burke for no discernable reason, until Burke must save her from herself.

The Destructive Misogyny of Grey's Anatomy

Ballie is denied the position of Chief Resident because she has a family.

Credit: www.abc.com

Copyright: www.abc.com

Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
 
Great observation. My wife loves this show. I have tried to watch it, but imho, while I know that medical professionals are real people too. I prefer the preception that they are above the fray of love issues, personall ills, and internal strife. I want to know, as a previous heart attack survivor, that when I am under their care, I have their undivided attention. It has gotten to the point that I can't even be in the same room on the computer when the show is on.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 7:05:00 AM

 
Interesting article. I disagree with you about Cristina. I think she was floundering because this is the first time she's been in love and she doesn't know what to do with it. I'm irritated with Meredith's damsel in distress story lines, though, and I'm surprised you didn't mention it.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 2:05:00 AM

 
This is a great article with thought provoking observations. I am left to wonder by this season if shanda is caving to the pressure of studio heads. I love the show but do find the biological clock, oh man of my dreams make my life complete motif. This last season was like a group therapy session come to life. There seems to be a lot of contrived angst. I also think they need to retool that spin off. I don't know why it's gotten all those accolades but I absolutely detested it.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 12:05:00 AM

 
great article!!!!

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 10:05:00 PM

 
I just started watching to first two seasons of Grey Anatomy and I could tell the difference between the first two and the third. There were some good moments on the third season but not many. Some of the story lines are absurd but I did watch an interview with Shonda and she wrote the Grey's Anatomy for herself...she based Grey's Anatomy on the type of medical show she wanted to see. So I guess that explains it... and there are six women writers on staff so I do not see how they could be so far off mark about the roles modern women play today... but most can agree that not many women choose to go into surgical specialty because of the demands and sacrifices one has to make in order to become a surgeon. We can not ignore the fact that even today in post modern society, it's hard for a woman to be successful and have a happy home life. So yes, the stereotype still does exist and I think the show does address this.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
The show really did ssem to flounder this seaason.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
I like your article, although I will reamain a loyal fan, too bad you didn't mention that the lady "McSteamy" met at the bar, was also a "grey", almost set it up for another go round with the same plot as the first...Can't wait to see what really happens though!!!!

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
I was really disappointed in the season finale. I was very irked that NOBODY had a happy ending, no matter how temporary that happy ending would have been. At least let somebody have a moment of joy. I was also irked that they made such a huge deal out of who was going to be chief of surgery only to have it remain with the current chief. What a waste of story line. It would have been much more interesting next season if they would have made McSteamy or Ballie chief. Not that I don't like the current chief, but why string us along on that story line just to have a "nobody could replace you" trite ending.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 3:05:00 PM

 
I actually liked the first few episodes -- and then the McDreamy soap started. After that, I was done. Shark bait.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 3:05:00 PM

 
I don't watch television, but have watched this show with my daughter who loves it. I was not impressed by the female characters as being strong female role models. Your article may be the answer to why I felt that way.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

 
Great article! The best thing I can say about the finale is that I'm SO happy McSteamy didn't get the Chief job. Can you imagine what a disaster that would have been?! It'll be interesting to see what they've got brewing for season four with the possible loss of 3 main characters (Addison, Burke & George).

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 2:05:00 PM

 
I love the show and you make some great points. Great article.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 1:05:00 PM

 
I thought Season 3 was great. In any show there are going to be aspects of the story that people will not like. As far as the characters changing, that is called character development. I see them as becoming deeper, more real and relatable figures. Yes, Ballie was passed over for Chief Resident, but you neglected to mention that the position was given to Callie, who is a woman as well. I see Christina as not sacrificing for her previous boyfriend because she was not in love with him, as she is with Burke. It is a deeper, adult relationship unlike the one she shared with her former professor. I feel that you are reading too much into it, but I do respect your right to your own opinion. I hope people will continue to watch and see how things unfold in the next season.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 1:05:00 PM

 
I am showing this to my wife who is a huge GA fan. she is going to hate it. Thank you for writing this. L.

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 12:05:00 PM

 
Wow great article, I just started watching Grey's on & off this season, and I saw the last episode after missing about 4 or 5 previous shows and was suprised that Izzie has fallen for George, and at how weak Christina became. I thought it was weird for her to have such an emotional reaction but I thought that maybe the writers were trying to convey another side to her and show a softer side. But now that I've read this I'm starting to see that you're right, and it was completely inappropriate for the Chief to not give Bailey the decision because he was being nosey about her home life. Because I haven't been watching regularly I didn't know that they implied that Callie is the reason why George failed, but I did pick up that he would be intimidated by her success. I'm not sure if Shonda's trying to be sexist, I guess she's trying to be realistic in a sense because many women do find that can't have it all, but I think that there are plenty of others who have found that for themselves an

Posted on 05/23/2007 at 12:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
Most Commented On