Find » Lifestyle » FDA Insists: No Donations of Gay Bl...

FDA Insists: No Donations of Gay Blood; It's Too Icky

Look Out Lesbians- You're Next!

By Anthony Caroto, published May 23, 2007
Published Content: 89  Total Views: 175,444  Favorited By: 24 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.5 of 5
Homophobic members of the Food and Drug Administration have discovered a way to live forever; therefore they can stand behind their ignorant decision to disallow men with alternative lifestyles from donating blood.

The decision was first made in 1983 as a means to prevent the spread of HIV through transfusions. A noble suggestion during a time when HIV / AIDS was an almost exclusive disease for gay, white males only.

On Wednesday the FDA reminded the public of their policy, via their website, despite being criticized by the Red Cross in 2006 who called it "medically and scientifically unwarranted."

"I am disappointed, I must confess," said Dr. Celso Bianco, executive vice president of America's Blood Centers, whose members provide nearly half the nation's blood supply.

Since 1977, any male with the courage to donate blood has been asked a few pre-poke questions just as a formality. Among the questions- "Have you had sex, even once, with another man?"

Answer "yes" and you'll be permanently banned from ever being a secret samaritan.

Note to FDA: No man who may be struggling with his sexuality is going to "come out" to you. And chances are, there's plenty of gay blood circulating in straight bodies.

In March 2006, the Red Cross, the international blood association AABB and America's Blood Centers proposed that a one-year deferral replace the lifetime ban.

With such great strides in modern medicine, HIV-positive blood can now be detected within just 10 to 21 days of infection, making the lifetime ban completely mute.

Alas, the FDA doesn't see it that way. Another FDA theory is that gay blood could actually turn a blood transfusion recipient gay - who will then sue the hospital and donor center. Eventually the whole world would be gay and thus ending procreation. So really, the FDA is only looking out for the future of humanity.

The FDA has budged just a smidge though- they've agreed to change their policy if given data that shows gay blood wouldn't pose a "significant and preventable" risk to blood recipients.

FDA Insists: No Donations of Gay Blood; It's Too Icky

Blood is red in all humans, not just the ones we like

Credit: Anthony Caroto

Copyright: Anthony Caroto

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
 
Very nice article. This was something I didnt know about at all.

Posted on 06/16/2007 at 1:06:00 PM

 
I don't get the big deal. A woman can have sex with a man and now know who he's been with before (what about a woman who is with a bi-sexual man?). She can still give blood. I don't see why any healthy individual should be denied the right to give blood. The medical community should be responsible for proper testing, but if someone is disease free, I'd be happy to take their blood, gay or not.

Posted on 06/01/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

 
The talking heads said it was medically safe to donate blood with Lyme disease, and one of the branches of the NIH, maybe the FDA, disagreed. Later Lyme disease was found via blood transfusion according to some studies. No you can't donate if you've had Lyme (for a year or more even though it's a bacterial infection, not viral) There has been Hep C contamination issues with immune globulin and whole blood, HIV contaminated blood killed nearly a generation of hemophiliac children - albeit that was early on. There are hundreds of contamination issues and may resulting deaths and chronic illness as a result. I don't see it as a gay issue, I see it as minimizing risk in a very imperfect science, oxymoron intended.

Posted on 05/30/2007 at 11:05:00 PM

 
I had NO idea about this --- VERY interesting!

Posted on 05/30/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

 
Perhaps in the near future, women will also be banned from donating, since we are rapidly becoming the number one risk group in the country...Imagine that!

Posted on 05/28/2007 at 7:05:00 AM

 
A study regarding HIV, HPV and blood transmission: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1287818 Questions: If HIV testing of donated blood is so accurate, how did these (transfused) kids end up infected with HIV? Would you want your child to become infected with HIV or HPV? Would you want to increase your risk of cervical cancer by receiving HIV-infected blood?

Posted on 05/27/2007 at 8:05:00 AM

 
"Homophobia" is a complete non-issue: We're talking about people, both heterosexual and homosexual who pose a risk to the blood supply by their exposure to pathogens. I could care less if someone is a gay man or a porn star or comes from a country with an active pandemic - I just don't want their blood. The "gay blood turning people gay" is just a red-herring. There's no credible evidence of an etiological cause for homosexuality.

Posted on 05/26/2007 at 12:05:00 AM

 
Great article. I just find this so appauling (Spelling) when I first heard abou it. It's as if the whole world is ignoring the real truth and is devolving. Bye

Posted on 05/25/2007 at 10:05:00 PM

 
So much for relying on science.

Posted on 05/25/2007 at 5:05:00 PM

 
Re "Concerned in Illinois"... Why is it always the homophobic ones who insist on describing gay sex in explicit detail??? Good article, Anthony. Found you from the forums... will subscribe to you right after the period in this sentence.

Posted on 05/25/2007 at 2:05:00 AM

 
(...continuation of last comment...) ...my immune system will already have been compromised by whatever condition will have made it advisable and necessary to have a transfusion.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 9:05:00 PM

 
(...continuation of last comment...) I do believe that those of us who would wish to avoid unnecessary risk, should be able to do so. While there are many individuals who choose to live a high-risk lifestyle, many conscientious persons strive hard to maintain monogamous relationships and to avoid infecting spouses or other persons. I do not think we should be punished by denying ourselves medical care so that homosexuals and other high-risk groups can donate blood. And, yes, Karen, I do not wish for myself, my husband or my child to be transfused with blood from any male who has engaged in oral sex with another male, especially as there is some likelihood that at least one penis of the two involved has found its way into the anal cavity or cavities of other men. With HPV running rampant in the population, with a definite link to cervical cancer, I am not eager to risk contracting any STD, as my immune system with already have been compromised by whatever condition will have made i

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 9:05:00 PM

 
In response to Karen Kaiser...It troubles me that you seem to have very little regard for persons who work very hard to maintain monogamous relationships with safe sexual habits, so as not to infect their spouses nor anyone else. Perhaps a potential solution to the issue would be to bank blood from high-risk groups separately, clearly marked with the nature of the risk. That way persons who wish only to utilize blood from low-risk sources could proceed with their medical procedures with a higher level of confidence. Persons who do not object to utilizing blood from high-risk sources could proceed, understanding that the risks of drawing from a high-risk pool are greater. Perhaps persons who do not object to high-risk sources are, themselves, of high-risk behavior, and perhaps already infected with STD's, themselves. Perhaps they don't care, or perhaps it is already too late for them to remain "clean." I do, however, believe that those of us who wish to avoid unnecessary risk shou

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 9:05:00 PM

 
My goodness...it is pathetic that there are still so many stereotypes and fears of people who are different around nowadays...

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 3:05:00 PM

 
This was interesting to read.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 12:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 35
Next >>
Most Commented On