FDA Upholds Ruling that Denies Gay Men from Giving Blood Donations

By JulieAnn, published May 24, 2007
Published Content: 100  Total Views: 54,449  Favorited By: 18 CPs
Rating: 4.5 of 5
A 1983 prohibition banned gay men, for life, from donating blood. On Wednesday, the government said they were keeping that policy in place, according to the Associated Press. This practice was put into effect to stop the spread of the HIV virus through transfusions.

The Red Cross and other blood groups had criticized the ban. The Associated Press said they referred to it as "medically and scientifically unwarranted." The FDA stands by it's decision.

All men who donate blood are asked if they have ever had sex with another man, after 1977. Even if it was just once, that is enough to get them banned for life. The Food and Drug Administration says that puts these men at a greater risk of carrying the HIV virus, which can be contracted through a blood transfusion.

Last year, in March, the Red Cross, the AABB, and America's Blood Centers told the FDA that new methods of testing could detect donors in 10 to 21 days. This would make the ban unnecessary. They asked to replace it with a one year waiting period, according to the Associated Press.

The FDA posted a document on Wednesday stating the policy could change if data was shown that could prove it would not pose a "significant and preventable" risk to transfusion recipients.

With regards to the document the Associated Press quoted Dr. Celso Bianco, executive vice president of America's Blood Centers as saying, "It is a way of saying, 'Whatever was presented to us was not sufficient to make us change our minds.'"

According to the FDA, HIV testing that is currently used provides highly accurate results. Yet the estimated risk of contracting HIV through a unit of blood is still about one in 2 million. Meaning the tests are not 100% accurate all the time.

Those opposed to the ban, citing the need for donated blood, say it is barring potentially healthy donors. Critics also claim the restriction is discriminatory against gay men. While the FDA acknowledges the potential loss of healthy donors, it denies the discrimination.

The Food and Drug Administration also has a lifetime ban on those who have used intravenous drugs or have been paid to have sex.

FDA Upholds Ruling that Denies Gay Men from Giving Blood Donations

FDA

Credit: Food and Drug Administration

Copyright: Food and Drug Administration

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
The God damned government needs to honestly get their heads out of the asses. It is completely ridiculous that I a healthy HIV-, Disease free 17 year old gay male can not donate my blood. IF they honestly think this is not discrimination they are completely stupid, Does the form ask if you are straight?? GET THE HELL OVER YOURSELF.. it is horrible that they can discriminate against gays!

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 7:03:44 PM

 
well actually there is a ban on people from certain parts of Africa, and you have to go through a waiting period if you even visit those parts of Africa. There is also a ban on females who have had sex with a man that has had sex with another man, even just once. There is also a waiting period if you get a tattoo or a piercing. Since testing is better now there should just be a waiting period for gay men.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

 
Yes, this is a stupid policy. I can't believe that they're still maintaining it. They don't ban sub-Saharan Africans for life, I don't think, or women who have had sex with bisexual men -- all risk factors. You can't make the blood supply a hundred percent safe, but our current testing and procedures do make it as safe as can be reasonably expected -- and would continue to even with the addition of the banned risk groups (with appropriate and sensible limitations).

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 3:05:00 PM

 
It's so stupid and shortsighted. The ban should be on anyone who has engaged in unprotected sex, anal intercourse, or used needles. the ban should be based on the risk factors, not a group of people. It assumes a lot. What of gay male 30 year old virgins? Are they still going to discriminate? THis makes me so mad. It's unenforceable anyway. How are they going to determine gayness? Will they ask all men who enter the clinic to recite lines from mommie dearest? please. I think it would be a great little dateline experiment to have some very queeny femme guy walk in to donate blood and write in that he is straight. let's see how he's confronted.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 1:05:00 PM

 
Yet another example of Government discrimination of gays. Granted, if a gay man is HIV+ then he should not be allowed to give blood. I say that if I can provide (which I can) recent proof (no older than a year), that I am HIV negative, then I should be able to give blood.

Posted on 05/24/2007 at 1:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On