The Ideas of America's Founders: The Bicameral Legislature

America's Founding Fathers designed a bicameral legislative branch with serious and specific considerations in mind. Their reasons for doing so were not arbitrary, and it is vitally important to examine the deep, innovative thinking behind the design of House of Representative and the Senate.

To mitigate the possibility of the legislature extending its power over the other branches of the government, the framers divided it into two parts and gave each different modes of election and principles of action (Federalist 51).

Of the two branches of Congress, the House of Representatives was designed to be the most responsive to the direct will of the people; all citizens eligible to vote for their state legislatures can elect representatives, and anyone over 25 and over 7 years a citizen of one's state is eligible to be elected.

Publius, in Federalist 57, expects the representatives to feel grateful to those who elected them at thus at least temporarily act in their constituents' interests. By frequent elections (every two years), they experience "a habitual recollection of their dependence on the people" and thus greater accountability to them. Furthermore, provided a spirit of vigilance exists in the society, the representatives will be checked by their inability to make a law not binding on themselves.

The Senate is a branch of Congress designed to confer political stability; the senators were originally appointed more selectively by the state legislatures, and qualifications for the Senate are higher-as a greater degree of wisdom, experience, and presence in the United States are needed to successfully deal with foreign powers (Federalist 62). The longer duration of senatorial terms enables to government to undertake long-term projects that "depend on a succession of well-chosen measures"; the senators' longer terms give them an incentive to pursue such projects but also render them accountable for any mistakes (Federalist 63).