Find » Business & Finance » If Money Were to Disappear

If Money Were to Disappear

By Deborah McDowell, published May 30, 2007
Published Content: 13  Total Views: 14,000  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.0 of 5
If I were to wake up tomorrow and there would no longer be such a thing as money, I don't think it would change as much in the world as we might think it would. People would still be going crazy over it by using mass amounts of valuable items to trade. Trading gems may be the new form of currency, which would be disastrous for the countries whose economies already heavily rely on an illegal diamond trade: mass brutality would increase even more. On a smaller scale, people may trade ipods, cameras, computers, jewelry, books, or clothes for common goods. Honestly though, I think if I woke up and all of the money in the world were suddenly gone, most things economically would just be put on hold until new money was printed, because most people in our world can't imagine life without something that too often is the main focus of their lives.

The biggest problem with leaning on trade as a lifestyle is that loan opportunities would be scarce. Banks would be useless regarding that. It's one thing to lend out bank members' money, which all looks exactly alike, and has virtually no chance of sentimental attachment. It's quite another to lend out personal items which always carry with them the possibility of some kind of sentimental value. There may be a solution to this problem, but I don't see one, and if I'm right, then there would no longer be any immediate opportunity for those who can't afford an education to get one, or those who can't yet afford a car to get one, or for anyone who can't afford one of the immediate essentials of life to get it at all. I think our poverty level would increase tenfold.

If we were to move back to the lifestyle of trading goods as a form of money, I don't think life would be any more comfortable than it is with money on a large scale. Just because money doesn't exist, it doesn't mean that poverty doesn't still exist, and those living at or below the poverty line are put in an even worse situation if they are relying solely on trade.

Takeaways
  • If Money were Destroyed
  • The Problems with Trade
Did You Know?
The use of only trade as a means of currency would actually prevent those in poverty from improving their status in the world.
Comments
Comment 1 of 1
 
 
Hmmm.... well, what would someone trade who dealt strictly in services: a waiter, a teacher, or that kind of thing? Not every landlord is going to want to be taught something or waited on, so how would those people aquire houses and stuff like that? We'd pretty much have to switch back to a subsistence economy without money. Also, the richest people in the world would be much more on a level with middle-class people. They woudln't be much better off. Finally, all money is is a sophisticated type of bartering, one that promises payment in some other kind of good, when that good is required/desired. Money's just a natural development of any economy.

Posted on 05/31/2007 at 4:05:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comment 1 of 1
 
Advertisment