Post-Mortem Photography

The Final Photo

By Jamie Sue Austin, published Jun 07, 2007
Published Content: 34  Total Views: 62,112  Favorited By: 10 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
Post-Mortem photography, the act of taking photographs of the recently deceased, was a common custom during the beginning of the 19th century. It eventually replaced the older and much more costly use of posthumous paintings. With the advent and popularization of the photograph came the ability for the middle class to memorialize their loved ones. A family that could not afford a lavish funeral or beautiful headstone could finally, at the very least, immortalize their memories via a photograph.

At a time when photographs were still new, this practice was not perceived as morbid. Posthumous photos were a testament to the lives of those gone before. In Victorian society birth and death rates were almost equal. Young children in particular faced a broad number of risks from childhood diseases to contaminated bottles and patent medicines. Because of this most post-mortem photographs are of small children. Most families did not take regular pictures of their children because of the expense involved; a post-mortem photograph was often the only picture of a child the family had. Children were sometimes posed sitting up, with their eyes open and favorite toy in hand, or in the arms of their mother.

Early post-mortem photographs most commonly were taken with the deceased outside the coffin. The deceased might be sitting upright in a chair or lying in the bed as if sleeping. Later photographs would show changes in funeral culture including the addition of lined coffins and funeral flowers. In some late century post-mortem photographs it is almost impossible to see the deceased for the number of flowers and crowds of people surrounding them.

Post-Mortem Photography

Most families did not take regular pictures of their children because of the expense involved; a post-mortem photograph was often the only picture of a child the family had.

Credit: Unkown

Copyright: None

Did You Know?
Many beautiful posthumous photos have been destroyed for their perceived morose connotations.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
I NEVER KNEW THIS WA SO COMMON. I FIRST HEARD OF THIS WHEN THE MOVIR " THE OTHERS " CAME OUT . BUT NOW THAT I THINK BACK ....I REMEMBER LOOKING THROUGH AN OLD FAMILY ALBUM IN MY AUNTS HOUSE AND SAW THIS PICTURE OF A LITLE BOY SURROUNDED IN FLOWERS AND HE LOOKED ASLEEP. WHEN I ASKED MY AUNT WHO THE CHILD WAS SHE SAID THATS MY SON....I WAS VERY YOUNG AND ASKED HER HOW COME I HADNT MET HIM AND THATS WHEN SHE TOLD ME THAT WAS A PICTURE OF HIM AT HIS FUNERAL .AAAAAAAHHH

Posted on 03/29/2008 at 8:03:23 PM

 
I too think that its very sad but in some cases it's very interesting. I wanted to be a mortician so I am somewhat facinated by death not in a sick way. The science of it is amazing. My dad passed away at the very young age of 34 and I wish that I would have took a photograph of him for the simple fact that I don't have too many photos of him and he looked very alive in the casket. The mortician did a fabulous job of capturing his true essence. But in my family it's a sign of disrespect to photograph the dead. So Ill just have to remember him the way I last saw him which isn't too hard. Anyways thanx.

Posted on 01/27/2008 at 12:01:46 AM

 
I too think that its very sad but in some cases it's very interesting. I wanted to be a mortician so I am somewhat facinated by death not in a sick way. The science of it is amazing.

Posted on 01/27/2008 at 12:01:37 AM

 
my sister told me she was in a thrift shop in grand junction colorado and that she picked up an old photo album and it was crammed full of pictures of dead people. she said there were pictures of entire families that were dead. (the people were all propped up in sitting positions.) that is how i stumbled upon this website. i'm trying to find out if what she saw in that photo album is/was common or if she found something very unusual that she should have purchased. It seems very unusual to me, and so far I haven't found much on the internet about it.

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 7:09:00 PM

 
Jamie, you're a wonderful writer. I loved this article. When my beloved cat passed away, I took photos of him in the flower filled box in which he was buried. I'm not even sure why... just a part of holding on and letting go, I suppose, for pets as well as people. Thank you for sharing this.

Posted on 07/25/2007 at 9:07:00 PM

 
BTW, I loved this article.

Posted on 07/15/2007 at 12:07:00 AM

 
This was so common --- it was even common with older people as well. My family is a bunch of packrats from WAYYYYYYYYYYYYY back, and we have several of these old type photos. I still find them creepy, but I cherish them. They're my history.

Posted on 07/15/2007 at 12:07:00 AM

 
oh! how awful!

Posted on 06/11/2007 at 8:06:00 AM

 
Since many illnesses and diseases did not have cures or treatments back then, I can see how a parent would want these photographs, especially since many times, if one child became ill so would the other children. Pandemics would often claim more than one victim. This was a really great piece!

Posted on 06/07/2007 at 4:06:00 PM

 
I can't imagine having only one picture of my child, let alone one where they were . . . dead. *Gets Shivers*

Posted on 06/07/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On