Who Are Latinos?

In the article "Who Are La Razas", La Razas were identified as people who identify themselves as "The Race". The NCLR defines "the race" as being comprised of Latinos or Hispanics. Latina refers to females. Latinos do not consider themselves Hispanics or descendents of Spain.
 Latinos and Hispanics use forms of the Spanish language. The La Razas are making such a ruckus in the United States of America it caused me to wonder exactly who Latinos are.

The Latin language was spoken by the people of Latium a region of ancient Italy. Because the people of Latium were living in the area before history was recorded not much is known about their origins. Conquered by the Romans in 338 BC, Latin became the formal language of Romans. "Vulgar Latin" was used among the soldiers and merchants of Rome. Languages derived from Vulgar Latin were later called "Romance Languages". These include languages such as Spanish, French, Portuguese, and Italian. Who are Latinos? Are they a race of people descended from Latium's or from the Roman Empire?

Latin America is considered to be "Latin" because the majority of the people speak one of the Romance Languages. Latin America is roughly comprised of 21,069,501 square kilometers as compared to 24,490,000 sq. km.square of other American lands. The American Continents were named after the Italian explorer, Americus Vespucci. Armies from Spain conquered much of the lands of South and Central America. English and French settlers took over the Northern parts of the Continent. Thus "Latinos" could be said to be descendents of the Spanish Conquistadores. This confuses me because the La Raza's precept is that the United States stole their land. The land at the time of Spain's invasion belonged to many people who were not Latinos.

Related information
Girl in photo is a "Latino" of mixed heritage: Spanish, Puerto Rican, Italian, German, Slovak, Lithuanian, African, and Native American Iroquois.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

well in understanding, latino is somebody who speaks any lenguage that came out of the latin root, example, spanish, italian ,french, portuguese, maybe romanian,... hispanic was a clasification given by some president of the USA, i cant remember who exactly, anyway hispanic was something similar to say, african-american, caucacian, asian, etc,..to me this word is related to the spaniard, becuase back in the days, spain was called HISPANIA,.. now to who ever say im spanish that means he most be from spain, but some times people say that as in: i speak spanish, is something similar when we say we are the best and "we the best".... well i hope this could help to others, by the way, i dont think hispanic refers to blacks or "negros"... amongst people who speak spanish you could find, indians blacks and whites mixed together thats why many cubans or dominicans or boricuas look more african, becuase the have more roots of it, and mexicans or south americans look more indians becuase th

Posted on 10/10/2008 at 1:10:30 AM

A local paper Letter to the Editor said Mexican/Americans are not Hispanic, because Hispanic meant blacks, Asians and Cubans. East Coast Puerto Rician friends use Hispanic; West Coast Mexican friends use Latino. The people I have known from Cuba, El Salvador, Hondorus (spelling), Columbia prefer "Cuban, El Salvadorian, Hondurian (and again spelling) and Columbian". Oh, and I guess I knew a few people from the Dominican Republic. I like to think we are all human beings, not labels. : >

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 6:09:00 PM

A Dominican cat told me he prefers Latino over Hispanic because Hispanic is equal to Negro. I've called __________ people Latino ever since. Your article sparked conversation between me and a Dominican buddy of mine about what she prefers to be called, and if it's due to history or name preference or both. I'm waiting on her response as I type this message.

Posted on 09/25/2007 at 10:09:00 AM

FYI: Published the remainder my "erasism" series here: http://www.mamariano.biz/ac.htm

Posted on 07/26/2007 at 3:07:00 PM

This is very very informative and interesting!

Posted on 06/13/2007 at 6:06:00 AM

Interesting article, Alyce. Sophie

Posted on 06/07/2007 at 8:06:00 AM

Very informative article.

Posted on 06/06/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

Andre, the NCLR was formed to deal with legimate "claims" about issues in the early 1900s USA. My series of articles was to point out that there is enough war and bloodshed worldwide without starting another civil war in todays USA.

Posted on 06/04/2007 at 2:06:00 PM

Very interesting and informative.

Posted on 06/02/2007 at 1:06:00 PM

So La Raza's really have no valid claim and pointing the finger at the wrong people. Sounds like alot of other racial organizations that are ass backwards with their so called "facts". Let's say the US humored them gave em back Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and Cali, just for goof measure...they do realize...they would fence all of that in and crossing out would result immediately in death.

Posted on 06/02/2007 at 11:06:00 AM

Comments 1 - 10 of 11 Next >>