Native Sovereignty, Are The Native Alaskans Owed or Have They Sold?

By Cee Peterson, published Jun 14, 2007
Published Content: 10  Total Views: 3,867  Favorited By: 0 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
During the 1800's the Russians were exploring a new land. This became known as Alaska. What they found was not only a new land, but also a new people. The United States of America bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. With the new land also came the native people. They brought with them their own culture and traditions. They abused and took advantage of the native people. They stole their land, their belongings and their culture. Many natives eventually died from the white mans diseases.

Until 1971 there was no reform for the native people. The natives of Alaska now want the right to sovereignty. They now want the right to be able to perform taxation and law enforcement. This would also include other such powers that are usually reserved for the state and federal government. This would include but is not limited to marriages, divorces, child custody and many, many more.

Although there may be proof to the contrary, nonetheless, I believe that native sovereignty is wrong. They have been paid compensation for their hardships, their traditional way of life is no longer existent and enough is enough.

With the Native Claims Settlement Act, Congress did away with native sovereignty in Alaska. In 1971 the State of Alaska made a deal with the Alaskan natives to give them twelve large corporations, 200 smaller ones, 44 million acres of their choice land, and large amounts of continual money in exchange for their Aboriginal rights. Each month every registered Alaskan Native receives a compensation check. Natives have profited greatly from their lands. Logging has been performed for years without state control or concern. They were paid and are continually paid for the oil revenue and other such Alaskan investments. They have been paid for their sufferings and now they want more?

Native Sovereignty, Are The Native Alaskans Owed or Have They Sold?

Native Sovereignty, are they owed or have they sold?

Credit: JaydBlu

Copyright: JaydBlu

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
"With the Native Claims Settlement Act, Congress did away with native sovereignty in Alaska." You clearly did not research this topic and the result is an ill-informed, inaccurate article. There is an entire chapter devoted to Alaska Natives in Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law and I highly recommend that you read it. With ANCSA, aboriginal claims to land were relinquished, not aboriginal rights as you state in your article. The 12 Native corporations established with ANCSA in 1971 differ from the "200 smaller ones" you mention; I think you are confusing the Department of the Interior's federal recognition of over 200 Alaska Native tribes in 1993 with the Native corporations. ANCSA did not strip tribes of their sovereign powers; that was not even the intent of the Act.

Posted on 12/03/2007 at 5:12:00 PM

 
of setting them free from themselves then just don't ever give it back. The reason for your upset is nothing other than GREED.

Posted on 06/18/2007 at 2:06:00 AM

 
If you rented a property to someone and made a profit from them and all the money that they gave you, would you then feel that they had paid you enough and therefor they should just keep it? It is the same principal, their land was taken from them, and they were quiet entitled to make money, just because they made money out of their own land does not mean that they should now just give it up because some people think that they have made enough. Would you tell a business man, well I think you have made enough, it is time for you to hand it over. And I guess if you guys are in Iraq long enough, you'll be saying, look how much we have given you and how much you have profited, why should we let you have your country back. Do you think that Iraq did not see America as bringing them freedom but saw Americans as invaders for no reason, NO, it was because everyone in the world, especially Iraq's knows how the current imperialist country works, borrow it, keep it for a while, under the auspices

Posted on 06/18/2007 at 2:06:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On