A Rational Cosmology: The Universe Cannot Be Created

Essay VI

This is Essay VI of Mr. Stolyarov's series, "A Rational Cosmology," which seeks to present objective, absolute, rationally grounded views of terms such as universe, matter, volume, space, time, motion, sound, light, forces, fields, and even the higher-order concepts of life, consciousness, and volition. See the index of all the essays in "A Rational Cosmology" here.


In "What the Universe is and is Not," I defined the universe as "everything that exists," a convenient shorthand for every entity that is.

If it is true that the universe is "everything that exists," and it could be created, then, whatever entity could create the universe, would be outside that universe. It follows, then, that such an entity would be outside "everything that exists." An entity "outside" existence does not exist! A non-existent entity cannot do anything. Creation is an action that an entity must perform; it cannot be performed if the entity that would perform it does not exist!

It is instructive to note that this principle automatically refutes both the theory that "God created the universe," as will be shown here, and that "the Big Bang created the universe," as will be shown subsequently.

Even if it were possible that all currently known entities were intelligently designed, they could not have been designed by a being that is somehow "beyond existence."

Rather, this being would need to be a delimited entity in its own right, with its own peculiar attributes (qualities) and capacities for action (relationships with other entities). Let the reader recall that everything which is or happens must in some manner involve some entity or entities. There are no such things as "pure" qualities, "pure" relationships, or "pure" creation, apart from the entities that exhibit, relate, and create.

Any Creator of other entities would thus need to exist and be a part of the universe, and it would need to relate to other entities in some manner, as a human creator relates to the entity, "brick," when he constructs the new entity, "building". The Creator would not be able to create the universe, the latter being a contradiction in terms.

Related information
Any Creator of other entities would need to exist and be a part of the universe, and it would need to relate to other entities in some manner, as a human creator relates to the entity.
 
Comments 1 - 2 of 2  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Avinash: Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves. Essentially, this involves someone attempting to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exemption.

Posted on 03/06/2009 at 5:03:15 AM

Just as you used the definition of "Universe" to prove that universe is not created by God nor by Big Bang, We can use the definition of God to prove that God created it. Defination of God as given in all scriptures and great logicians is " One who has no cause and is the cause of all causes". Now It is very logical to understand that , Since we are part of His creation we on our own have no Power to find the Creator. When we see a car we naturally accept that it came from a workshop created by a person. We dont say that "It has no Cause". Now when we see the superb mechanism of conception , then few months after conception there is birth of a baby. This baby has a immediate cause i.e the father and mother, but both have no knowledge of the internal process. So they are just the means and not the original cause. Similarly you will find many intermediate causes, but the ultimate is the God(by definition). So creation has not stopped. As men are continuously creating, even

Posted on 09/19/2008 at 1:09:13 AM

Comments 1 - 2 of 2