Congress Panel Hears Testimony Regarding Warrantless Wire Tapping Program

Rights Groups Claims NSA's Program is Unconstitutional

By A. Kairi, published Jun 08, 2007
Published Content: 140  Total Views: 34,447  Favorited By: 8 CPs
Rating: 4.6 of 5
The Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties held a hearing Thursday regarding the National Security Agency's wiretapping program. The wiretapping program allows the agency, which has authorization from President George W. Bush, to use wiretaps without obtaining a warrant.

The panel heard testimony from the American Civil Liberties Union, according to a press release on the ACLU's website. The rights group claims that the program is unconstitutional.

The director of the ACLU Washington office had this to say about the program: "Americans deserve to know the extent of this program. When it comes to giving the public answers, the administration has been dragging its feet and stonewalling for over a year now. Finally, the tide is turning. We're optimistic in the wake of Congress' effort to get to the bottom of this unconstitutional program. We must not lose momentum," according to the ACLU's press release.

The ACLU filed a lawsuit against the government in 2006. The agency represented a group of journalists, scholars, attorneys, and individuals who disagreed with the NSA's warrantless tapping of phone calls and emails. The government alleged that court action on the case would force the disclosure of national secrets, and asked that the case be dismissed.

The government's request was denied and in 2006 a judge, Anna Diggs Taylor, ruled that the wire tapping program was unconstitutional because it violated the First and Fourth amendments and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

According to the ACLU, Taylor wrote the following statements in her ruling: "It was never the intent of the Framers to give the President such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights."

Takeaways
  • congressional panel hears testimony regrding the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program
  • President Bush has authorized the NSA to place wiretaps without obtaining a warrant
  • In 2006 a judge ruled the program to be unconstiutional; white house wants congress to appove it
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
I think the government has been using illegal wire-tapping for years. The problem is the evidence would not be allowed in a court of law. The question is what is the gov up to if they feel they need to justify spying on ordinary citizens?

Posted on 06/23/2007 at 1:06:00 AM

 
I think that the system should stay the same. Get a warrent for a wire tap. I mean, if they have this warentless stuff going on, even innocent bystanders would be spied upon. My best friend and I have decided that we'weird out the Government with our odd phone conversations. We're just that weird!

Posted on 06/09/2007 at 10:06:00 AM

 
My guess is the President George Bush initiated this after 9/11. Based on what I know about US government, they are able to issue this after George Bush said, "We are in a State of Emergency." Once the President issued a STATE of EMERGENCY, many of our freedoms were taken away. I just hope after the war, the government will give those freedoms back.

Posted on 06/08/2007 at 5:06:00 PM

 
Well, I definitly do not want them running amok like this. that's why I write so much about the ACLU because I think everyone should know about the abuse of american rights going on every day in so many areas of our government. What's been going on is a shame, and a slap in the face to our founding fathers and our american ideals. I wonder what point there is in fighting Al-Qaeda if there is no recognizable america left when its all said and done because our government has twisted all our democratic principles. We must not destroy ourselves in the attempt to protect ourselves.

Posted on 06/08/2007 at 3:06:00 PM

 
There is only one reason for WARRANTLESS wiretaps- can't get a warrant. Now think about that. Do we want the gov't running amok like this?

Posted on 06/08/2007 at 3:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On