Declaration of Independence - Give No Credit to Jefferson, They Were All Locke's Ideas

The In-Depth Connection Between John Locke's Ideas and the Declaration of Independence

By Killian Dionysus, published Jun 15, 2007
Published Content: 8  Total Views: 2,270  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
Normally, when people think of the Declaration of Independence and John Locke, they are reminded of the Declaration's phrase "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" and how it connects to Locke's phrase "Life, Liberty, and Property." They attribute the two words to Locke's theory, and may make the mistake of assuming that those two words are the only thing that Locke contributed to the ideology of the Declaration. But Locke's contribution does not end there; his theory is the foundation of the Declaration's ideology. In fact, every phrase of the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence directly relates to John Locke's theory on civil government.

Jefferson claimed that the Declaration was a compilation of many ideas. He set out "not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent." (Jefferson 1892, 99). It was a collaborative effort. Even though much of the Declaration can be related to other sources more specifically and directly, they relate only to portions of the Declaration, not the whole. It is only Locke's theory that wholly encompasses the political philosophy behind the Declaration.

The Preamble consists of five sentences and fourteen phrases. Some of these phrases connect to Locke's theory by using the same wording, and others are a summation of his ideas. Everything connects to his theory very directly through the themes of laws of nature, common opinion, equality, rights to life liberty and property, security, and the evils of monarchy.

Sentence One: Dissolving Bonds with a Corrupt Government

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,"

Declaration of Independence - Give No Credit to Jefferson, They Were All Locke's Ideas

John Locke

Credit: Public Property

Copyright: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dtbain/Students/Course%201K/locke.jpg

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
 
The reason why works signify the life of man is, that they constitute his life. For a man has thought and will, and action from both of these. What is in a man's thought and not in the will is not yet in him. What is in the thought and in the will, and not in the act, indeed enters the man, and is a beginning of his life; but still it passes away and disappears, not yet having any termination. But what is in the will, and thence in the act, this constitutes his life, and remains, whether it be evil or good. That thought alone does not constitute a man's life, is evident from this, that a man can think many things which he does not will, because he does not love them. AE 901

Posted on 03/26/2008 at 11:03:15 AM

 
It is easy to discount the ferver with one writes when stirred, I assert that the lad did a wonderful job and shall end up as rich as Thomas Paine (who Jefferson owes as well).

Posted on 08/03/2007 at 5:08:00 PM

 
To Schlimmer: I agree that it would have been a stronger argument if I had examined where Locke's ideas came from, I'm sure much of what he wrote must have drawn on outside sources, but then the article would have to be twice as long or longer. The thesis of the article is that the entire document can be related to something Locke wrote whether or not they were originally his ideas; he was the first to compile all of these ideas. To Laurel: Thank you, it's good to hear from someone who is willing to give my article a thorough read. Also, though Jefferson and Locke were never friends, Jefferson, as well as may other of the founding fathers, were openly huge fans of Locke's work. To Chuck Block: True, my title is a bit callous. It's much easier to get people to read with an outlandish title. My original title was "A Foreign Founding Father." Jefferson does deserve credit for writing the DoI with eloquence and for many more things beyond the DoI. My main purpose was not to discredit

Posted on 07/05/2007 at 4:07:00 PM

 
Thanks for an interesting Independence Day read. Jefferson and his worthy contemporaries recognized, but more importantly, were able to convey those governing principles in documents that have advanced the cause of human liberty. And while as a Nation we are not perfect, we are challenged as individuals to contribute to those ideals of equality, liberty, and fraternity! The DOI is an inspired document composed of the best ideas of that period of enlightenment. It is corruptible and conspiring men (& women) that undermine the ideals of that Declaration. As a people, if we let them undermine those principle (by not holding them accountable) we do not deserve the liberty they champion.

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 3:07:00 PM

 
Stating outright that Jefferson did "nothing" is a bit callous. Jefferson was a brilliant philosopher in his own right, and as I recall, Locke garnered respect for himself--along with Hobbes, Rousseau, and Montesquieu--in the days of the Constitution's infancy. Those four have almost always been associated with the doctrines of Jefferson.

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 12:07:00 PM

 
I'm not sure that I agree with Scott - I felt this was pretty solidly researched; although some of these ideas were expressed by others at various times before the Revolution and the Era of Enlightenment, it was quite clearly by Locke's influence as much or more than Jefferson's that the Declaration is written as it is. They were contemporaries and friends, if I recall my history correctly (and my memory isn't all it should be), so it is not surprising that Jefferson would incorporate not just Locke's ideas, which he shared, but whole phrases from his writings, into the Declaration of Independence. Nice job; I hope more people read it. It seems to me that many of the things the DoI objected to are going on within our current administration...

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 9:07:00 AM

 
Interesting article. A lot of this is spurious though. Sure, Locke may have supported inalienable rights, but so did the Magna Carta, hundreds of years before Locke was born. I like the topic, but it sounds like you didn't consider the possibility that they *weren't* all Locke's ideas. If you want to make a stronger argument, you have to consider that possibility and address it.

Posted on 07/04/2007 at 8:07:00 AM

 
oo good job well done.

Posted on 06/20/2007 at 12:06:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
Most Commented On