The Dangers of Irradiated Food
Nuked Nuggets, Anyone?
Literally.
As noted by journalist Mark Worth, food irradiation, though tested as early as the 1920s, did not become a widespread practice until the 1950s when wheat and potatoes were irradiated to hold less bacteria and keep longer in storage(2). Even then, it was used only on select items. The irradiation process involves using either gamma rays, x-rays, or electron beams to zap foods-fully packaged-by passing them through an enclosed chamber where they are exposed to radioactive beams for specific periods of time at precise dosages. By destroying the DNA molecules of harmful organisms, it renders potentially dangerous bacteria in foods harmless (3). Thus foods are safe and everyone is happy.
But that's not the whole story.
As preliminary results arrived from research of irradiated food, researchers began to realize that irradiation might not be as harmless as they thought. Epstein observed that studies done by the USDA's Agricultural Research Service found irradiation produced significant losses of vitamins, especially the antioxidant vitamins A, C, E, and the energy promoting B vitamins (2). In fact, one source noted the loss of up to 95% of vitamin A in chicken, 86% of B vitamins in oats, and 70% of vitamin C in fruit juices (2). Still sound harmless? As if these figures were high enough, both chicken and oats are usually cooked before we eat them, which further destroys the heat-sensitive vitamin C. What's left is a food whose nutrition is highly questionable.
You may also like...
- Controversy Over Irradiation
- Food Irradiation: The Truth
- Is Irradiated Food Safe to Eat?
- The Food Irradiation Debate
- Irradiation Technology: Could it Be Our Answer to Kill E. Coli in Our Foods?
- When Green and Crispy Isn't Wholesome
- CONVERTED! The Short Road to Vegetarianism
- Top Five Unnatural Foods: Clone Burgers Not yet on List
- Food for a Healthy Body
- Healthy Eating for a Balanced Lifestyle: From Fruits to Vegetables to Dairy and Grains
Did You Know?
It is cheaper for producers to allow overcrowding, dirty water, bad feed, hasty processing, and sloppy handling to save money, and then "fix" it by nuking the inevitable colonies of bacteria abounding in the meat or poultry
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On


