A Rational Cosmology: Life as a Purely Physical Process
Essay LXXIV
By G. Stolyarov II, published Jun 14, 2007
Published Content: 955 Total Views: 279,709 Favorited By: 33 CPs
Embed:
This is Essay LXXIV of Mr. Stolyarov's series, "A Rational Cosmology," which seeks to present objective, absolute, rationally grounded views of terms such as universe, matter, volume, space, time, motion, sound, light, forces, fields, and even the higher-order concepts of life, consciousness, and volition. See the index of all the essays in "A Rational Cosmology" here.In his essay, "Life," Mr. Reginald Firehammer tries the following approach to disprove the physicalist worldview regarding life, consciousness, and volition:
"The mistake made by those who are physicalists for that reason is the assumption that if we cannot be directly conscious of a thing, it cannot be. The danger of this mistake is that it leaves the door open to mysticism, because it is obvious to everyone that there are phenomena which we cannot directly perceive, but know, if no other way, at least from introspection."
The issue here is whom the pronoun "we" refers to. If "we" means any given single individual, then there are indeed things that that individual cannot be conscious of, such as the entirety of another person's life, consciousness, and direct experiences.
However, if "we" means all of the human beings who exist and have existed, then no such experience has ever been inherently barred from being fathomed by the sum of those people's knowledge. Person A is aware of his own consciousness, Person B is aware of his own consciousness, and each of them can harness this knowledge in useful ways.
The physicalist view does not state that anybody can directly perceive everything (even the time limitations on this alone make this impossible), but rather that for anything that exists, there is the potential for somebody to perceive it directly.
I would challenge the opponents of this view to name anything that they consider exclusive of such a designation, and I will be happy to demonstrate how it in fact fits it quite well.
Furthermore, Mr. Firehammer actually concedes the physicalist point in a correct statement of his, as I will endeavor to show by logical extrapolation therefrom:

More by G. Stolyarov II
- Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and Related Ideas - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
- Pareto-Optimality and Related Concepts - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
- Exam-Style Questions on the Method of Moments, Significance Levels, and the Neyman-Pearson Lemma: Pr...
- Public Goods - Public Choice Economics Study Guide
You may also like...
- A Rational Cosmology: Space-as-Relations...
- A Rational Cosmology: Why There is No Su...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Qua...
- A Rational Cosmology: Coordinate Systems
- A Rational Cosmology: The Euclidean Line
- A Rational Cosmology: The Impossibility ...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Qua...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Axioms of Exis...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Natures and Ta...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Requirements f...
Did You Know?
The physicalist view does not state that anybody can directly perceive everything (even the time limitations on this alone make this impossible), but rather that for anything that exists, there is the potential for somebody to perceive it directly.Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Today's Most Commented On
Advertisment
