The Incompatibility of Guardianship with the Infliction of Harm
This essay will make an ethical case for why a guardian can never choose to terminate the life of a person under his protection, for whatever reason and under whatever circumstances. Nor can a guardian allow the "guarded" to commit acts detrimental to life, health, and moral integrity.
Nobody who is "guarded" can make an intelligent, informed, fully responsible decision to refuse medical treatment or to act in any manner to the detriment of his own life. To illustrate, if an adult wished to smoke cigarettes and thus act to the detriment of his own life, his action would
be of questionable morality, but legal and within the scope of his natural rights. It should be both immoral and illegal for a child to smoke cigarettes.
A child's guardian, being entrusted with the child's survival for a certain period of time, must ensure that the child commits only acts clearly beneficial to his life or at least harmless thereto. To allow the child to smoke (or to starve himself), even when the child explicitly states that he wishes to commit such acts, is gross negligence and contradicts entirely the very purpose of guardianship.
This principle is not unique to children, but rather applies to everyone over whom guardianship exists, as its roots are not contained in the age of the "guarded," but rather in their incapacity to adequately use their rational faculties in all things.
The guardian must allow the guarded to use their rational faculties where they have shown clear capacity to do so (i.e. where they make autonomous decisions benefiting their lives) and must intervene with the decisions of the "guarded" where they have shown an incapacity to reason (i.e. where they either make detrimental decisions or fail to make beneficial ones). Here, beneficial decisions are defined as those prolonging an individual's life, and detrimental ones as those curtailing it, with such definitions stemming from the fact that life is the ultimate value and, without life, no further pursuit of values is possible.
Nobody who is "guarded" can make an intelligent, informed, fully responsible decision to refuse medical treatment or to act in any manner to the detriment of his own life. To illustrate, if an adult wished to smoke cigarettes and thus act to the detriment of his own life, his action would
A child's guardian, being entrusted with the child's survival for a certain period of time, must ensure that the child commits only acts clearly beneficial to his life or at least harmless thereto. To allow the child to smoke (or to starve himself), even when the child explicitly states that he wishes to commit such acts, is gross negligence and contradicts entirely the very purpose of guardianship.
This principle is not unique to children, but rather applies to everyone over whom guardianship exists, as its roots are not contained in the age of the "guarded," but rather in their incapacity to adequately use their rational faculties in all things.
The guardian must allow the guarded to use their rational faculties where they have shown clear capacity to do so (i.e. where they make autonomous decisions benefiting their lives) and must intervene with the decisions of the "guarded" where they have shown an incapacity to reason (i.e. where they either make detrimental decisions or fail to make beneficial ones). Here, beneficial decisions are defined as those prolonging an individual's life, and detrimental ones as those curtailing it, with such definitions stemming from the fact that life is the ultimate value and, without life, no further pursuit of values is possible.
Related information
A child's guardian, being entrusted with the child's survival for a certain period of time, must ensure that the child commits only acts clearly beneficial to his life or at least harmless thereto.
Most Comments Today
- Death at Disney World in Orlando, Florida Monorails collide one driver has died at the Disney World Theme Park in Orlan... 23 Comments
- Why Would a Web Writer Drop DayLife.Com? Before I share my story with you, dear readers, I want to point out that Dayl... 22 Comments
- Give a Damn Another new song, this one describes the feelings of us who save the world ev... 22 Comments
- Is Obamageddon Coming? The times they are a changin' - but are we hurtling toward Armageddon - or as... 20 Comments
- A Little Good News Today Here is...a little good news today. 18 Comments
- Bachelorette 5 Spoiler: Wes Hayden Spills the Beans About... This week July 6, 2009 episode 8 of the Bachelorette Jillian will finally d... 18 Comments







Cheryl Dennett
Posted on 07/04/2007 at 9:07:00 AM